Trump’s Policies Are Hurting Christians in Other Nations

Trump’s Policies Are Hurting Christians in Other Nations September 13, 2018

Donald Trump – profaner, adulterer, abuser, con artist, potential tax cheat – and celebrated champion of the American evangelicals.

I’ve watched with heartbreak, as respected members of the American church body have laid their offerings of praise at this man’s feet.

I’ve lamented a church that puts politics over their faith because, as I’ve been told so many times, they felt they had no other options.

In other words, adhering to their faith was not an option. They were forced to choose between two evils (they believed), so they chose the “lesser” evil and called it good.

I’m also not of the belief that Christians should divorce themselves from the political process. I’ve stood in the pulpit of my own church and spoke to the congregation about the Constitution, the powers the church has through the First Amendment, the damages done when those in Washington ignore the 10th Amendment, and the importance of Christians voting their faith.

I’ve even advised about setting up voter registration booths within the church.

Yes, you can absolutely do that and it violates nothing.

My point then, as now, is that there are values Christians across the world hold dear, and Donald Trump violates all of them. Those things taught from the pulpit should spur us to expect better out of our political leaders – not to institute a theocracy, as some believe is the goal, but to stay true to our faith. Our focus should not be on political wins above the coming kingdom of God.

So what if this is really who we are, as a nation?

We get the leaders we deserve. They are a reflection of those who vote for them. If our leaders are corrupt, it is because the people are corrupt, and sadly, America’s Christians have not done a great job of distinguishing themselves from the world.

I wrote on Wednesday about the persecution of China’s Christian community, oppressed by an atheistic, Communist government.

Christians in China are being jailed. Their Bibles and religious figures are being destroyed and they’re being forced to sign away their allegiance to Christ, in favor of their government.

China isn’t even the most oppressive region for Christians in the world! They’re 43rd out of the top 50.

Interestingly enough, the number one spot for Christian persecution belongs to North Korea, as Christians there face ghastly punishment and oppression for their faith. The Kim regime is brutal to those who claim faith in a God over him.

And Donald Trump speaks in glowing, respectful terms about Kim Jong Un. Remember that, American Christians, when you next take to your knees before the MAGA altar.

As a Christian in America, your “oppression” is from your first world problems. You’re free to worship. No one is coming for you if you carry your Bible or wear your cross right down Main Street USA.

I pray before every meal at every restaurant I visit, and I have never had anyone try to stop me. I’ve never been reported for it, hauled out, questioned by authorities.

We are not suffering for our faith. For that, I am grateful, but that lack of testing has certainly blinded us to the plight of our brothers and sisters who have not been so blessed.

Middle Eastern Christians, desperate to escape oppression and danger in their homelands have now been caught up in some of Donald Trump’s policies, even after he promised to help them.

The number of Christian refugees granted entry into the U.S. has dropped by more than 40 percent over the past year, a decline of almost 11,000 refugees. They have been caught in the wider net of President Donald Trump’s tough stance on immigration and refugees, which has lowered overall refugee admissions by the same percentage.

Even Christians from the Middle East who have lived in the U.S. for years have been caught in the administration’s wider crackdown on immigration, with dozens of Iraqi Christians now in detention and facing the threat of deportation.

Also, a group of Iranian Christians are stuck in Austria now, believing that they would be granted asylum in the United States, only to be stopped by Trump’s travel ban.

The group of Iranians is mostly Christian, including Armenians and Aramaic-speaking Assyrians, but there are also representatives of other religious minorities — Zoroastrians, Mandeans and Jews. The Iranians have been stuck in a legal purgatory in Austria, some for as long as two years, as they await entry into the U.S.

The Iranians in Austria applied for admission to the U.S. under the Lautenberg-Specter program, which was designed as a pathway to America — via a short stay for processing in Vienna — for religious minorities fleeing oppression from the former Soviet Union and Iran.

Until now the program — which dates back to the Cold War — has operated smoothly for years, with an acceptance rate close to 100 percent. But due to unprecedented delays, the short stay has stretched into as long as two years for some of the Iranians in Vienna, where they are unable to work and have become destitute.

That’s not helping.

A refugee rights organization, the International Refugee Assistance Project brought a class action suit against the U.S., on behalf of those Iranian refugees, claiming Homeland Security had violated the Lautenberg law.

Apparently, the reasons given from DHS for denying entry were vague, at best. A court order states that if they deny entry again, the reasons given must be more clear.

Some of the stories are pretty awful.

One of the refugees, referred to in anonymous testimony in a court filing as Jane Doe 5, is an Iranian Christian widow stranded in Vienna with her 90-year-old father and disabled son.

After the death of her husband in Iran, she said, “it was extremely difficult for me to secure a job due to the unwillingness of the majority Shiite population to hire Christians.”

She said that her son, who suffered from epileptic seizures, was refused medical attention because doctors “would often refuse to touch him because Christians were ‘unclean.’”

One day she was assaulted in broad daylight at a local market, she said, but chose not to report the incident to police because her assailants warned her she would face criminal punishment.

Her sister-in-law, based in the U.S. applied for her asylum, based on what she knew about the Lautenberg law. She felt she’d only be left in Vienna for several months, as part of her processing.

“I sold most of our possessions at below market rates in the expectation that we would not be returning to Iran,” Doe 5 said.

She’s been in Vienna since February 2017. She was interviewed by DHS personnel, then she, her father, and her son all received the same letter, denying their entry, and the only reason given was a box checked, “other reasons.”

You can’t get much more vague.

“Mass denials of Iranian religious minorities stuck in Vienna demonstrate how religious minorities have been harmed under this administration,” said Mariko Hirose, litigation director for the International Refugee Assistance Project.

Refugee advocates told NBC News some of the Iranians have become homeless and some have taken to selling their blood plasma to help them feed their families.

A State Department spokesperson said the Iranian applicants to the Lautenberg program “are subject to the same stringent security vetting processes that apply to refugee applicants of other nationalities considered for admission to the United States of America.”

Christians, unlike some religious minorities, are recognized under Iran’s constitution but regime authorities regularly raid churches, arrest and imprison Christians and target evangelical Christian converts, according to a report by the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, a federal commission.

Interestingly enough, under the same Lautenberg law, Christian refugees from Ukraine and former Soviet republics are moving through the process at a comfortable pace.

In May 2017, Vice President Mike Pence gave a speech, where he rightly pointed out that Christian communities in the Middle East are in jeopardy, and noted that the Trump administration was ready to help.

The administration touts aid sent to Christian communities in these regions, and that’s a good start, but the policies being fomented in the bowels of Trump’s Cabinet, spearheaded by men like Stephen Miller are sweeping up Christian refugees and leaving them in dire straits.

Does Trump care?

Considering they don’t vote, I wouldn’t count on it.



"Actually those weren't considered heretical. People got in trouble more for church heresy than science. ..."

No, Jesus Was NOT Polyamorous
"It ain't anti-sex. There is a difference between that and being against polygamy, because throughout ..."

No, Jesus Was NOT Polyamorous
"Heretical ideas aren't necessarily bad ones -- the following were all considered heretical at one ..."

No, Jesus Was NOT Polyamorous
"There's no idea that someone won't fall for. Were that not the case, popes and ..."

No, Jesus Was NOT Polyamorous

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • The pulpits are in dire need of biblically sound ministers, unfortunately too many of them are feeding their congregation half-baked political theories that not only contradict and subvert the principles of this republic, but those of God as well! We have religious leaders choosing to be political hacks and political hacks pretending to be religious leaders in the media.

    Happened across a sermon by Rev. Alexander Proudfit from a book titled ‘A Series of Discourses On The Leading Doctrines And Duties of Christians Vol 3’ which was published in 1815. Here is a excerpt from it that will either nourish the soul or lay further anguish on an already guilty conscience.

    On this day of humiliation, as the messenger of the Lord of hosts, and as I desire to be found faithful to my trust when the storm is blackening over us, I bear my testimony against the promotion of unprincipled, immoral, impious men as a most aggravated iniquity in our land; and I believe as firmly as I believe my existence, that without speedy and special repentance on our part, this insult to the Lord of hosts will bring wrath upon our nation, “until both our ears will tingle.” Has he not most solemnly forewarned us that “when righteous men are in authority the people rejoice, but when the wicked rule the land mourneth?” Besides, the election of men to public office, who are destitute of moral rectitude, is impolitic in the extreme, and puts in jeopardy our most important interests as citizens. Hear the sentiments of a reverend member [John Witherspoon] who adorned our counsels during the struggle with Great Britain; one in whom were united the eminent divine, the enlightened statesman, and the uncorrupted, ardent patriot.

    “Those who wish well to the state ought to choose to places of trust men of inward principle, justified by exemplary conversation. Is it reasonable to expect wisdom from the ignorant; fidelity from the profligate; or application to public business from men of dissipated life? Is it reasonable to commit the public revenue to one who has wasted his own patrimony? Those who pay no respect to religion and sobriety in those whom they send to the legislature of any state are guilty of the greatest absurdity, and will so pay dear for their folly. Let a man’s zeal, profession, or even principles as to political measures be what they will, if he is without personal integrity and private virtue, as a man he is not to be trusted. I think we have had some instances of men who have roared taverns for liberty, and been most noisy in public meetings, who have become traitors in a little time. Suffer me on this subject to make another remark. With what judgment will laws against immorality be made, or with what vigor will they be executed, by those who are profane and immoral in their own practice? Let us suppose a magistrate on the bench of justice, administering an oath to a witness, or passing sentence of death upon a criminal, and putting him in mind of a judgement to come. With what propriety, dignity, or force can any of these be done by one who is known to be a blasphemer, an infidel, or by whom in his convivial hours every thing serious or sacred is treated with scorn.”

  • PoqVaUSA

    Susan Wright, what are you recommending that Christians do in the United States? Are you really suggesting that this is an appropriate time to be opposing Trump, when the very forces of corruption encouraged by and supportive of Hillery Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, and Barack Obama are actively trying to steer this country toward impeaching Trump?

    Do you have any idea the threat that this country is facing from the politicization of the IRS, the DOJ and the FBI by those who support a VERY anti-christian world view?

    You seem to scoff at the idea that sometimes people need to make a choice between two unpleasant options, and need to pick the one that is least bad. I just want you to consider where your inflammatory rhetoric against Trump would lead this country.

    Jesus told his followers to be “wise as serpents, and harmless as doves”. Matthew 10:16. Consider that admonition in the context of our current situation.

  • Polarbearpapa

    You left out that Jesus(Matthew 10) was sending them out like sheep among wolves when he said that …

    ..Kinda tough to quote that part of the verse with a straight face when the leader of the nation is a wolf in sheep’s clothing…

    27 Your leaders are like wolves who tear apart their victims. They actually destroy people’s lives for money!

    28 And your prophets cover up for them by announcing false visions and making lying predictions.

    They say, ‘My message is from the Sovereign LORD,’ when the LORD hasn’t spoken a single word to them.

    Ezekiel 22

  • IllinoisPatriot

    I (and many others) just want YOU to consider where YOUR inflammatory rhetoric against the 1st Amendment (and your support for the rest of Trump’s agenda of bigotry, ignorance and alienation of our allies) would lead this country. Trump has stated on NUMEROUS occasions that he wants to censor the press, and punish people for publishing opinions that are not praising him in all things. This is against the 1st Amendment’s guarantees of freedom of speech.

    This entire article was about Trump restricting access to the US of refugees (especially Christian refugees) from the ME in violation of existing law and previous commitments made to them that the refugees have acted on in good faith – a good faith that Trump does not share.

    Whether you agree with Muslim refugees entering the US or not, we DID give our word that would grant asylum, we passed a law, we set up a program and set criteria for screening and vetting of refugees fleeing oppression. Trump has thrown all that out with no notice, no procedure, and with an EO – an EO that does NOT have the force of law, nor the authority to ignore the laws for refugees already in existence.

    Furthermore, Trump is doing nothing to end the “asylum” that is routinely granted to the refugees that cross our borders daily, proving that he does not care about the number of immigrants entering the US (the numbers are now back to or higher than the worst of the Obama years) – he only cares about the refugees that originate from MUSLIM countries (even if those refugees are Christians and looking for a peaceful life away from the persecution of the Koran).

  • PoqVaUSA

    You stopped short of the part that follows:

    looked for someone among them who would build up the wall and stand
    before me in the gap on behalf of the land so I would not have to
    destroy it, but I found no one.
    I will pour out my wrath on them and consume them with my fiery anger,
    bringing down on their own heads all they have done, declares the
    Sovereign Lord.” Ezekiel 22

    Who is the one who favors building the wall?

    What makes you so sure that you are in tune with the will of God in this matter? Why do you not have more to say about the corruption of high officials in the federal bureaucracy? There crimes are blatant disregard for the limits to their authorized powers. Have you nothing to say about that?

  • Marcion

    It’s almost as if conservatives never actually cared about persecuted foreign Christians. At the end of the day they were just a grievance object for them to get worked up about, not actual people to be helped.