Die Another Day?: How The Fear of Death Controls Us

Die Another Day?: How The Fear of Death Controls Us June 18, 2021

As the terror of COVID-19 wanes in the West it seems appropriate to do two things. First, to carefully reflect on the response of government to the pandemic and, second, to assess our cultural attitude toward death and dying. With regard to the former, there will be great controversy, especially as the corruption and incompetence that informed key decisions about managing the pandemic comes to light. With regard to the latter, there may be less controversy, at least in the political sense. Still, theologically speaking, there is also a level of corruption and incompetence that has shaped our cultural understanding of death and which must be seriously reevaluated. Of course the two are not unrelated, as our cultural response to death ultimately drives the political response (or, better said, politics plays off of cultural sensibilities).

In addition, the Church’s attitude must be especially scrutinized. How churches handled the effects of the pandemic and the demands of local magistrates will tell us something about how the Church has been influenced by the cultural mood. That the Church, the living embodiment of God’s people on earth, is influenced by the culture in which it exists is not the issue here. There is always an “acculturation” of the Church militant to its surroundings. However, that cultural attitudes often conflict with biblical claims about reality is also a truism. And so we must be diligent. For if we fail to see death in light of the Gospel, then we may open ourselves up to the innate cruelty of man.

Die Another Day: Friedrich Dürrenmatt On Doing Evil to Avoid Death

Although little known in the English-speaking world, the Swiss dramatist Friedrich Dürrenmatt was one of the most popular German language authors of the post-WWII era. Born in the Canton of Bern in 1921, Dürrenmatt was the son of a Protestant minister fluent in the biblical languages and in Latin (see Heinreich Goertz, Dürrenmatt, 13). Classically educated, Dürrenmatt went on to become one of the most prolific playwrights of his day. However, it was his series of detective novels that earned him global status (the final book of the series, Das Versprechen (The Pledge), was even made into a Hollywood film with Jack Nicholson cast as the main character).

In the second of Dürrenmatt’s 3-part detective series, Der Verdacht (The Suspicion), we meet Commissar Bärlach, the hero of the story and of the previous novella. Bärlach is an aging veteran detective who, at the start of the novel, has just survived an operation. He has a terminal illness and only a short time to live. However, due to an uncanny series of events he comes to discover that nearby in the pristine Swiss Alps there is luxury clinic being run by a former Nazi concentration camp surgeon. The surgeon calls himself “Emmenberger” today, a play off the famous Swiss valley of “Emmental,” but whose name during the war was “Nehle” (Dürrenmatt often indicts his home country of Switzerland for its failures during the war, feeling that no country could or should have remained ‘neutral’ in such times).

Nehle’s modus operandi (literally) is performing surgery on patients without narcotics (i.e., anesthesia). We quickly discover that it is this operating on victims for the dual purpose of experiencing their pain and having power over life and death that is the raison d’etre for the former Stutthof torturer. Nehle’s joy is pure sadism, as he lives to see others as mere objects of his use and abuse.

However, Dürrenmatt introduces another, more diabolic twist to the narrative. It is a twist that will help illuminate our current crisis about death and dying. Nehle, currently under his alias “Emmenberger,” no longer executes this macbre torture on helpless Jews. Instead, having escaped war-time justice, he runs a health spa for the ultra-rich. It is here that bankers, politicians, industrialists and their mistresses come and allow themselves to be operated on, without anesthesia, by the famous clinician. These moguls pay exuberant amounts of money to be tortured and, in doing so, Emmenberger continues the same evil work he began during the war. In fact, he is praised for his abilities, and many of the super wealthy who come visit him treat him as a god (Goertz, Dürrenmatt, 36).

Why such madness?

Emmenberger has honed his surgical skills in such a way as to extend the life of his patients. He cannot extend it indefinitely (this is not a sci-fi genre), but the rich and powerful are willing to undergo all manner of debasement if only to live just one more month, one more day, or but a few more hours. Here is the ultimate deal with the devil– the truly grotesque as man allows evil to be done to him out of an absolute sense of fear. The fear of aging and dying drives these wealthy patrons to hand themselves over to a person who hates them thoroughly, or, at least, who sees them as no more valuable than an inanimate object, albeit more useful.

Committed to justice, even at the risk of his already fragile life, the noble Bärlach provides the counterpoint to both Nehle’s cruelty and the vanity of his patients. In spite of his weak condition, he refuses to give up seeking out evil and bringing it before judge and jury. He voluntarily checks himself into Emmenberger’s Davos-like clinic, hoping to find some way to bring this criminal to trial. However, before the aging knight can come up with a plan to seize his foe, he is found out by the sadistic doctor. A local magazine article has revealed Bärlach’s identity as the recently retired Bernese detective. By chance, a copy of the magazine lies in Nehle’s clinic. Helpless and exposed, Nehle now plans to operate on the heroic Bärlach later that evening, without anesthesia, until he dies. The one seeking justice will be sacrificed on a bed of torture, flayed alive like the martyr. To add to his anguish, Nehle places a clock over Bärlach’s head (after having him restrained) so he can here the seconds tick down to the moment of his torture.

In the end Bärlach only narrowly escapes the clutches of the evil one, being rescued in deus ex machina fashion by a former prisoner of Nehle’s, a giant Jew who goes by the name “Gulliver.” Nehle, or Emmenberger, the perfect nihilist, cannot be brought to justice in any humanistic sense of the word. For the nihilist there is no such thing. Justice is purely a convention, an invention of prudish and weak humanity. Sadists like Nehle cannot be brought to justice, they must simply be eliminated. Dürrenmatt has the battle-worn Gulliver break into the clinic minutes before Barlach’s scheduled “operation” and execute his former torturer “according to the law of Moses.” So much for retribution.

The Creed of the Nihilist

In the shadow of the war, Friedrich Dürrenmatt, like his contemporaries Brecht, Borchert and Böll, struggled mightily to understand the horror of Nazi Germany they had just witnessed. The need to understand death and cruelty pervade these artists’ thought and writings. Very few of them ever found solace in traditional religious explanations for such evil, even if Dürrenmatt seemed to try. Nevertheless, the value of their work and their experiences is indispensable to Americans who have never seen such mass devastation in their homeland.

In the figure of Nehle/Emmenberger, Dürrenmatt presents us with the kind of nihilist that bothered even Nietzsche. Nehle is not the homeric artist, who in virtue of his own will to power creates in abundance for the strong and the weak to enjoy. Rather, he is the great annihilator, who in virtue of his desire and willingness to transgress all boundaries, dares to destroy–and destroy programmatically. In the words of Alfred in The Dark Knight , Nehle, like the Joker, is the kind of man who simply “wants to see the world burn.”

In the final discussion with Bärlach, moments before Nehle’s own death, he expresses succinctly his nihilistic creed,

I believe that I am. I am a piece of this world of matter, of atom, energy, mass, molecule, just like you [Bärlach], and I believe that my existence gives me the right to do what I wish. As a piece of matter I exist but for a brief moment and by pure chance, just as life in this vast universe is nothing more than one of its immeasurable possibilities. Life is just as random as I–were the earth a bit closer to the sun, there would be nothing–and in this is the meaning of my life, to exist but for a moment.

Dürrentmatt, Der Verdacht (Zurich: Diogenes, 1986), 109 [translation mine].

Raw existence is enough justification for Nehle to pursue anything that should bring him pleasure or satisfaction or purpose. It is a merely contingent fact that for this particular human organism the activity that gives him the most satisfaction, the greatest sense of purpose, is the torturing of other human beings for fun,

What makes me free?–murder and torture; for if I murder another human being…if I set myself outside of every human convention, conventions constructed in our weakness, then I am free, even if only for a moment, but what a moment it is!

Dürrenmatt, 110. [translation mine]

In a purely material universe is Nehle to blame for finding his satisfaction in these pursuits? Ultimately, who or what is there to judge him as right or wrong?

As mentioned, in the end Dürrenmatt does not have Nehle’s crimes adjudicated before a human court. He has Gulliver, an archetypal figure, simply end his existence. If there is justice done, it must be of a cosmic and mysterious sort, and it must be bloody. All the while Bärlach, like Christ, remains silent before his tormentor, unwilling to participate in his inquisitor’s game of rationalization. There are no words to compel the purely evil will; only raw power can subdue it. Batman cannot reason with the Joker, nor win him over with mercy and compassion. The Joker’s own demise is for himself a joke.

But, why bring all of this up? What does this artistic portrayal of nihilism have to do with the Church in a time of pandemic? As I alluded to, I think the answer lies in our willingness to hand ourselves over to that which is immoral, cruel even, in light of what we fear. And, if the Church’s attitude toward something like death becomes identical to that of the culture, then the likelihood of a doorway to cruelty opening up becomes all the greater.

The Church and COVID-19: Are We Too Afraid to Die?

That there will be some natural fear of death is unavoidable. After all, most of our experiences are embodied ones. Well, probably all of them (except for those who have had legitimate near death experiences). In his novel, Dürrenmatt points out a terrifying dynamic. It is a dynamic we have seen play out in human history. On the one hand there is the nihilist, the sadist sociopath, who is willing to flout all laws, human or divine, for the sake of satisfying his morbid curiosities and grotesque desires. But, on the other side of that relation is the subservient person who, for their own reasons, is willing to offer themself up to the torturer. These too are looking for control. Not of other people but of their own circumstances. This longing to control our circumstances, however, can take us beyond the pale of morally appropriate action.

For many in America today it would seem that fear is the great motivator to participate in the games of the powerful. That fear is fear of death and dying. COVID-19 has exposed our willingness to submit, without much critical thought, to the will of the powers that be. While I am not suggesting that measures like lockdowns or masks were entirely inappropriate, there is nevertheless a cautionary tale to be told about our readiness to accept them as legitimate mandates.

The person of good will desires to give the benefit of the doubt to those in power. However, those more astute to human nature will also recognize that the desire to have power over others is always present in society. So-called “experts” may very well be masters in their particular field of science or technology. But that expertise, like Nehle’s expertise as a surgeon, says nothing of their moral character. In fact, one should suspect that those who are most narcissistic, and perhaps most nihilistic, will often be those who exercise an inordinate amount of influence in culture. Especially intelligent people are often the ones who have maneuvered themselves into positions of great authority and impact.

The Church must, therefore, be the prophetic voice that checks and balances this drive for power. This must happen both in the microscopic arena of the family, as well as the macroscopic domain of the nation. However, if the Church itself no longer lives in the hope of the goods promised us after physical death, but instead cowers before it, then it will be quite hard indeed for the natural fears of man to not overwhelm him and his community. Further, if natural fears, like the fear of death, overwhelm a majority of the populous, then the balance of liberty will tip in favor of those few who would and who can exercise control over the masses–all for their self-serving purposes.

Various ideologies in human history have sought the magic formula to realize human liberation from the burden of man’s existential condition. The Ancients saw liberation in the earthly Kingdom, the Marxists in the classless society, the Existentialists in the will to define one’s own nature. Only Christianity has been able to point to a formula that exceeds all these but that addresses the underlying motivation for each. That formula is the liberation from death itself and the promise of everlasting life. If the Church in the West capitulates on the reality of our eternal existence, even if for a moment in time, then it is no longer fulfilling its call. Then it is only preaching an ideology, equal to, perhaps, but no more compelling than any of these others.

If we are too afraid to die as Christians, then we are not really alive in Christ. The answer to human liberation has always been, and ever will be, a robustly ontological one. We must remind ourselves and our culture that death is not the end, lest we fall prey to evil men.

When this perishable body puts on imperishability, and this mortal body puts on immortality, then the saying that is written will be fulfilled:

“Death has been swallowed up in victory.”
 “Where, O death, is your victory?
  Where, O death, is your sting?”

The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. 57 But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.

Romans 5:54-56












"Maine_Skeptic,I am a big advocate of free speech! So as long as there are not ..."

Violent People Living in A Virtual ..."
"I guess it's good that I didn't lash out. :^) The only thing we see ..."

Violent People Living in A Virtual ..."
"Yes, a rhetorical strategy for the sake of attaining a political goal.That is definitely one ..."

CRT and The Return to the ..."
"There is a fine balance we often must strike on morally complex issues. That is ..."

Living a Life of Grievance Can ..."

Browse Our Archives