Ask Orthodox Jews in Norway where one can find a fresh shoulder of kosher beef and they will give the same answer — nowhere.
There is more to this obscure fact than a clash between Jewish tradition and the concerns of animal-rights activists in today’s Europe, Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz told a Jewish forum in Oslo. This is a symbolic fact about tensions that surround Jews in Norway.
“You live in the only country in the world today that does not permit kosher shechita,” he said, at the city’s Chabad House. “Shechita” is a rite in which a skilled Jew uses an extremely sharp blade to swiftly sever an animal’s trachea, esophagus and the arteries and veins of the neck, allowing blood to drain out.
“They wonder why there are only 800 Jews or 900 Jews living in Norway. This is a country that permits the butchering of seals, the butchering of whales, but not this ritual slaughter — which has been proved by every scientific means to be one of the most humane means of slaughter.”
The audience grasped the big idea behind his words, since this March 25 event — which was recorded — was held in an outreach center for observant Jews. How can Jews honor the details of their ancient faith without keeping kosher?
However, Dershowitz noted that when he asked other Jewish community leaders about any anti-Semitic trends in Norway, all they would say is that “things are wonderful,” before falling silent.
“How can things be wonderful,” he added, “if you can’t have your own meat? How do you deal with the meat here, do you have to bring it in from England?”
Someone in the audience quietly replied: “We don’t talk about certain things.”
Among First Amendment and criminal law attorneys, few are as famous and infamous as Dershowitz. He joined the Harvard faculty in 1964 and, three years later, was promoted to full professor at age 28. Even a brief summary of his courtroom career would include a gallery of clients such as porn star Harry “Deep Throat” Reems, British socialite Claus von Bulow and O.J. Simpson. In the 1970s his attempts to defend Russian dissident Anatoly Scharansky made global headlines.Dershowitz didn’t travel to Norway just to talk about dietary laws.
The goal was to lecture about legal affairs and, especially, the role of international law in Israeli-Palestinian conflicts through the years. However, the Zionist group that organized the tour — the International Christian Embassy in Jerusalem — found that Norwegian academic leaders were not anxious to have Dershowitz lecture on their campuses, at no expense to the hosts.
The dean of the Bergen University law faculty, according to Dershowitz, said the school would “be honored to have Prof. Dershowitz give a lecture on the O.J. Simpson case, as long as he promises not to say a word about Israel.” The Harvard professor has written six books about the Middle East, advocating a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian standoff.
Israel was the key, in part because of 2009 debates at Norwegian universities about a proposed boycott at Jewish Israeli scholars and others who support Israel. However, rather than focusing on recent conflicts about occupied territories, Dershowitz noted that the text defining the boycott began by saying: “Since 1948 the state of Israel has occupied Palestinian land and denied the Palestinians basic human rights.”
In addition to challenging the founding of the state of Israel, the first academic leader to sign the boycott petition also offered a harsh critique of the “egocentric … tribe-mentality” among Jews in Israel, Norway and “all over the world.”
While Norwegian leaders keep talking about dialogue on these issues, said Dershowitz, it will be hard for Jewish leaders to take part in bridge-building efforts if their voices are not allowed to be heard. The only previous time in his career in which he was turned away from major universities was in “apartheid South Africa, when I was Nelson Mandela’s lawyer.”
The bottom line: Boycotts do not promote dialogue.
Based on recent events, Dershowitz said it appears Norwegian intellectuals want “dialogue with Hamas, but not with Dershowitz. Dialogue with Hamas, but not with Israel. … Dialogue with people that we agree with, but not with people we disagree with. This is not dialogue. This is a one-way monologue.”