Many readers are aware that Lifesitenews is being sued by Father Raymond Gravel. This recently was the subject of a full page spread in one of Canada’s national newspapers. Here’s the story. There are all kinds of interesting things that could be debated in the piece. To me the most fascinating paragraph was the following:
Mr. Westen [Lifesitenews editor-in-chief] said he does not consider his approach to be confrontational. “I wouldn’t say we are stirring up trouble nor would I say it’s a hard-line approach,” he said. “I feel, honestly, nothing but love for Fr. Gravel. I pray for Fr. Gravel. I feel no hatred, ill will or anything for Fr. Gravel in the least.” Asked why it was considered relevant to repeatedly mention Fr. Gravel’s past as a prostitute, Mr. Westen said he did not consider it to be disparaging. “Anyone who comes from a bad past and leaves a bad past is to be celebrated for that reason,” he said.
Now, it is one thing to maintain that Lifesitenews is not confrontational. But does anyone really believe that Lifesitenews’ repeated references to Father Gravel’s history as a prostitute are celebratory in nature? Does John-Henry Westen really believe that?
Here is the Lifesitenews response to the piece in the National Post.
If Lifesitenews is to be exempt from the kinds of criticisms made by faithful Catholics like Father Thomas Rosica, a little self-reflection is in order. Tu quoque is too easy.
Brett Salkeld is a doctoral student in theology at Regis College in Toronto. He is a father of two (so far) and husband of one.
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In