The Two Tasks of Moltmann’s Future Church

I’ve been reading through Moltmann’s recent work, Ethics of HopeNot surprisingly, Moltmann develops his ethics through the framing of eschatology. Christian ethics must be understood with reference to Messianic Christology, which means that the resurrection of Christ determines how we understand present and future history. Indeed, present history is a present-future tense when understood in light of the resurrection and in the light of the promises of new creation. The church, or the organized version of Christianity, understands its vocation only in and through the Eschaton: the promised fulfillment of justice and righteousness in a transformed history. At the beginning of the book, Moltmann distinguishes his ethical approach from Reformed, Lutheran, and Anabaptist approaches as a transformative eschatology based on this Messianic Christology and an ecclesiology that is determined by the future, rather than by the present (only) or the past.

When Moltmann speaks of the vocation of the church, he denotes two related but distinct tasks. It’s worth quoting this section for you in full:

It [the church] witnesses through social service and prophecy, that is to say, through commitment to the victims and through criticism of the perpetrators. The connection between the two things is self-evident. The person who visits the sick and hears them complain that they have been left alone and forgotten by their families, goes to these families and appeals to their consciences. Through their congregational and organized social services the churches turn to the victims of this society and try to give them support, practically and spiritually. They surround the disabled with compassion and take in the unemployed and the homeless, and provide meals for the hungry. For this the churches are valued by many people, and in Germany are supported and furthered by the state. But they are also used by state and society in order to limit the damage caused by their systemic injustice. In order to prevent this, Christian service to the victims of this society must go hand in hand with public, prophetic criticism of the abuses resulting from the systems in force. Its service makes the church popular. This critical prophetic voice may in certain circumstances make it unpopular among many people. But what is at stake is the truth which alone can make it free–societies too–and the righteousness and justice which is meant to give life to all (184).

So, the call of the church with respect to justice and righteousness is twofold: to serve the poor and needy (which makes the church popular) and to publicly critique the structural (political, economic, etc.) injustices which create the conditions of having poor and needy people to serve.


"What do you folks think of this one?-- Quoted from News4JAX -- 11/25/16 --"JACKSONVILLE, Fla. ..."

Divine Intervention vs Divine Involvement
"So Melville traveled to Jerusalem in an effort to recover his Christian faith...hmmm, interesting, but ..."

Melville’s Epilogue
"I fail to see how Holbein's work 'deprives the Christian of hope' any more than ..."

The Dark Light of Thomas Kinkade
"You’ve written nice post, I am gonna bookmark this page, thanks for info. I actually ..."

The Dark Light of Thomas Kinkade

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment