“Kalam Infinity Arguments and the Infinite Past”


A view of Montserrat with clouds
Montserrat, near Barcelona (Wikimedia Commons)


Many, though not all, criticisms of Mormonism and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are fairly shallow and rather obviously flawed.


The so-called “kalam infinity argument” is not one of those.  Drawn from the works of medieval Islamic philosophical theologians — hence the Arabic word kalam, which literally means “speech” but, in this context, refers to a kind of dialectical theology that flourished in Islamic circles from at least the 800s AD — it’s a serious piece of thinking.


Blake Ostler responds to an attempt by the evangelical philosophers Paul Copan and William Lane Craig — both of whom I’ve met and for both of whom I have considerable respect — to apply the kalam infinity argument to Mormonism:




Posted from Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain



"What is it about civil rights laws that you have reservations about?"

Senator Barry Goldwater on would-be Senator ..."
""...we might reasonably ask how memetics applies to Dawkins’s own convictions." I didn't say she ..."

Sawing off the branch on which ..."
"Ad hominem, yes, but fallacious, no.The crucial difference here is that Pearcey's embarrassingly juvenile YEC ..."

Sawing off the branch on which ..."
"Gil, do you honestly believe Jones could have won if Moore had not been such ..."

Senator Barry Goldwater on would-be Senator ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment