“Kalam Infinity Arguments and the Infinite Past”


A view of Montserrat with clouds
Montserrat, near Barcelona (Wikimedia Commons)


Many, though not all, criticisms of Mormonism and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are fairly shallow and rather obviously flawed.


The so-called “kalam infinity argument” is not one of those.  Drawn from the works of medieval Islamic philosophical theologians — hence the Arabic word kalam, which literally means “speech” but, in this context, refers to a kind of dialectical theology that flourished in Islamic circles from at least the 800s AD — it’s a serious piece of thinking.


Blake Ostler responds to an attempt by the evangelical philosophers Paul Copan and William Lane Craig — both of whom I’ve met and for both of whom I have considerable respect — to apply the kalam infinity argument to Mormonism:




Posted from Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain



"For the record, I don’t think gemli is an ignoramus. I don’t agree with him, ..."

Eagleton on Dawkins and Dennett on ..."
"For the purposes of this discussion, let's say Joseph's results that bear duplicating are a ..."

Eagleton on Dawkins and Dennett on ..."
"I can’t think of an instance where the tenets of my faith and science’s “truths” ..."

Eagleton on Dawkins and Dennett on ..."
"No doubt I'll keep working on it."

Eagleton on Dawkins and Dennett on ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment