Enns Responds to DeYoung about Historical Adam

Pete Enns has responded to Kevin DeYoung’s post offering ten reasons for believing in a historical Adam. Like me, Pete is not impressed, and he interacts with my response in the process of articulating his own. Click through to read it!

Stay in touch! Like Exploring Our Matrix on Facebook:

Digital Humanities in Ancient Jewish, Christian and Arabic Traditions
The Plain Meaning of the Text
Lectures on Neglected Aspects of the Bible and Christianity
The Bible and Star Wars

CLOSE | X

HIDE | X