Enns Responds to DeYoung about Historical Adam

Pete Enns has responded to Kevin DeYoung’s post offering ten reasons for believing in a historical Adam. Like me, Pete is not impressed, and he interacts with my response in the process of articulating his own. Click through to read it!

LOST Rewatch: The Life and Death of Jeremy Bentham
Transhumanism and the Church
Discount on the Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Ethics
How Grown-Ups Communicate