From “A tale of the Christ” to “Revenge set him free”?

Behold the new poster for the upcoming TV mini-series adaptation of Ben-Hur. Hat tip to Hollywood North Report.

Incidentally, I’m not sure it’s really all that big a deal that this “epic” mini-series will be four hours long. Take out the commercial breaks, and this TV show could easily be shorter than the big-screen Charlton Heston version of this story.

OCT 13 UPDATE: Matt Page has found another poster for the mini-series which calls it “an epic tale of revenge and redemption”, and he wonders what the “source of redemption” will be in this version of the story. Jesus? Or something else?

He also notes that the website for Alchemy, the company producing this mini-series, was down for renovations earlier today — but if you go there now, the story’s logline reads like so:

Based on the classic novel by Lew Wallace, BEN HUR tells the story of a young man whose best friend betrays him, sending him into exile, slavery, and near certain death. Through his skill as a chariot driver, Ben Hur triumphs over his enemies and eventually finds peace through forgiveness.

Peace through forgiveness? Okay, that’s more like it. So what’s with the sword in the poster? Maybe he uses it in the sea battle.

The Alchemy website also says the film will be a “2 x 90′ mini-series”, which would seem to confirm that, without commercials, this mini-series will be three hours long — or about half-an-hour shorter than the film that starred Charlton Heston.

Abel Ferrara’s Mary comes to New York.


Abel Ferrara’s Mary (2005), which tells the story of a movie star who is deeply affected by her performance of Mary Magdalene, played in European theatres a few years ago and has been available on DVD there for some time, too. But it has never been released in Ferrara’s native New York — until now. The New York Times has this to say, in a profile of the director that ran today:

Mr. Ferrara’s 15th feature, “Mary,” which had its premiere at Venice in 2005, is only now having a run in New York. (It opens on Friday at Anthology Film Archives.) Like “Dangerous Game” and “The Blackout,” his 1997 drama about a bender-prone movie star, it revolves around a film within the film — in this case a biblical indie called “This Is My Blood.” The leading lady (Juliette Binoche) is so shaken by playing Mary Magdalene that she decamps for Jerusalem. Back in New York a television talk show host (Forest Whitaker) finds himself struggling with his faith as he prepares to interview the Jesus movie’s brash director and star (Matthew Modine, in a role that inevitably calls to mind Mel Gibson but also contains strong elements of the freewheeling Mr. Ferrara).

“Mary” is simply the most direct expression of spiritual crisis in a filmography riven with Catholic notions of guilt and redemption. “I don’t know how anyone with half a brain can make a movie that’s not about those things,” Mr. Ferrara said. “The Catholic thing is so ingrained in our upbringing. Where I come from you’re not raised to think on your own. It’s not that you’re pushed to read the Bible. The Bible is read to you.” But when he started working on “Mary” — “living within three blocks of the Vatican,” he noted — he revisited the Bible and this time approached it “as a revolutionary tome.”

Mr. Modine, who first worked with Mr. Ferrara on “The Blackout,” said via e-mail that he and Mr. Ferrara prepared by poring over ancient scripture. “Abel and I tried to strip away the interpretations and poetic language,” he said.

Like a more serious and angst-ridden “Da Vinci Code,” the film draws on Gnostic texts that have offered alternate views of the life of Jesus and the origins of Christianity. (Several theologians, including Elaine Pagels, author of “The Gnostic Gospels,” are enlisted as interview subjects on Mr. Whitaker’s talk show.) With its sincerely ambivalent efforts to plumb the nature of belief, it’s the rare movie that could stand as a rebuke to both “The Passion of the Christ” and “Religulous.”

Mr. Ferrara pointed out that “Mary” won not just jury and critics prizes at Venice but also the ecumenical award sponsored by a Catholic communications organization — or, as he proudly overstated it, “the Vatican seal of approval.”

So … any chance this film will play in any other North American cities? Such as, oh, Vancouver? And are there any plans yet to release this film on DVD over here?

Michael Moore harasses Canadians again!


Canadian and American elections used to happen in different years, and at different times of year, on a fairly regular basis. Lately, however, our elections have been coinciding more and more often. Case in point: Canadians go to the polls this Tuesday, the day after our Thanksgiving, while Americans go to the polls three weeks later, a few weeks before their Thanksgiving.

So Michael Moore has decided to make a movie comparing elections in the two countries. But he’s not going to be a mere objective observer, oh no. Instead, he brought his camera crew to Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario this week to film himself going door-to-door in support of a candidate there.

Reports Pete Vere:

Michael Moore, the controversial American film-maker, appeared at an all-candidates debate in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario this week, where he knocked on doors with the NDP candidate and mocked the local Conservative candidate.

I was at the debate because I live in the riding. As an undecided voter I felt the debate presented a wonderful opportunity to question local candidates.

Yet by the end of the debate my questions were for Mr. Moore: What had brought him to our little neck of the Northern Ontario wilderness, a camera crew in tow?

Moore was tight-lipped when I approached him.

He was working on a movie, in colour and under two hours long. Beyond that he does not comment on his films while they are in production, he said.

Moore’s camera crew proved similarly camera-shy when approached. Two refused to answer any questions, or to disclose their names. One simply shook his head while pointing to my camera.

“I don’t want to be interviewed,” he said, when asked the same question I had asked Moore.

The question was eventually answered by a Moore’s cameraman, who identified himself as John Walter. Moore was taping footage for his new movie comparing Canadian and U.S. elections. . . .

One wonders if this movie is related in any way to the so-called sequel to Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004) that was announced some time ago.

The end of Walden?

Walden Media was created seven years ago to make movies based on classic children’s books, among other things.

But of the 20 films they have produced so far, only six have grossed over $50 million: Holes (2003), Bridge to Terabithia (2007), Charlotte’s Web (2006), Journey to the Center of the Earth (2008) and the two Chronicles of Narnia movies (2005-2008). The rest have been either modest successes at best, given the low budgets that some of them had, or outright flops at worst.

Two years ago, Walden joined forces with Fox to become one of that studio’s several boutique labels, and around this time last year, Variety magazine even ran an article announcing that Fox Walden was ready to challenge Disney for a share of the family-movie audience — a challenge that didn’t turn out so well for Walden in the months that followed.

And now? Variety reported nine days ago that Fox has “absorbed” its Walden division:

After launching two years ago to much fanfare, the Fox Walden marketing venture is being shuttered as a stand-alone company and will be re-absorbed as an inhouse unit of 20th Century Fox’s marketing division.

As part of the restructuring, about a dozen Fox Walden staffers will be laid off. In addition, Fox Walden marketing prexy Jeffrey Godsick will segue to the Century City studio as exec VP of marketing and digital content and will also retain his Fox Walden title. . . .

Though Fox and Walden had high hopes for the joint venture when it was created in August 2006 to market family films produced by the two companies, there weren’t enough pics to warrant a stand-alone marketing entity. In the ensuing two years, only three movies have been released under the logo: “Nim’s Island,” “Mr. Magorium’s Wonder Emporium” and “The Seeker.” Though “City of Ember” will unspool next week as part of the partnership, there are no films planned for release in 2009. . . .

And how did City of Ember do when it opened yesterday? Not very well. So badly, in fact, that David Poland opined:

City of Ember on 2022 screens… an unmitigated distribution car wreck. The film is heading to one of the very worst opening weekend per-screeens of this year (around #115 of 125 wide releases). The crew at Fox Walden seemed to be working without an ad budget and with a lot of energy… that didn’t take. The choice to launch the film at Fantastic Fest instead of prioritizing the national media ended up defining the experience.

And, one must say, that Jeffrey Godsick’s return to Fox just days ago tells us that “they” knew exactly what was about to happen, that Jeffrey was taken back onto the mother ship as the studio surely agreed to do if things didn’t work out, and that the end of Fox Walden as a production entity is unannounced but inevitable.

So will Walden survive apart from Fox? Who knows.

If memory serves, at the time they hooked up with Fox, Walden wasn’t supposed to have any new non-Fox projects on the go except for the Narnia series, the rights to which are co-owned by Disney — and as far as I know, The Voyage of the Dawn Treader is still in the works for a May 2010 release, even though Prince Caspian was widely regarded as something of an underperformer this year.

But apart from that? Like I say, who knows.

For what it’s worth, the box-office failure of City of Ember should probably also be seen in the light of what Patrick Goldstein has described as “the Fox bad movie streak”:

Out of sheer horror and dismay, ever since I launched the blog early this summer, I’ve been keeping track of all the awful movies released by 20th Century Fox, the one studio in town that seems to actually pride itself on its ability to avoid using A-list talent and successfully market dim-bulb movies. Putting aside last spring’s “Horton Hears a Who,” Fox has released 21 movies since the July 27 opening of “The Simpsons Movie.” Of those 21, none has managed to even score a mediocre 50 at Rotten Tomatoes, the Web’s leading aggregator of movie reviews. Hence the streak. (Rotten Tomatoes seemed a scrupulously fair barometer, since it’s owned by–ahem–News Corp., Fox’s parent company.)

Now the streak has reached 22. The studio today released “City of Ember,” a family-friendly fantasy from Walden Media about a post-apocalyptic underground city running out of energy and food. I actually would’ve gone to see a screening of the film myself, since I admire its director, Gil Kenan, and its costar, Bill Murray, but the idea of a print journalist like me getting invited to an early screening of a Fox film is about as likely as Oliver Stone getting a personal invitation to a Sarah Palin rally.

To be fair, Fox has managed to make a bit of money here and there, despite a generally agreed-upon lack of quality; the phenomenal success of last year’s Alvin and the Chipmunks caught everyone by surprise, for example.

But consider this: Prince Caspian was originally going to open in December, around the same time as Alvin and the Chipmunks, but then Walden decided to put it off until the summer, to make room for The Water Horse: Legend of the Deep, which was also produced by Walden, and which came out on Christmas Day. The end result? The Water Horse didn’t make all that much money, and Prince Caspian‘s mediocre box-office performance was blamed on a crowded summer market. And Alvin and the Chipmunks, which was not a Walden film, had the holiday-season family-movie audience pretty much all to itself.

So Walden, by bumping its Disney movie out of the way of a non-Walden Fox movie, may have helped Fox to make more money than it expected to. But Walden itself didn’t reap all that many benefits, and the movies that Walden has made for Fox since then continue to disappoint.

Make of all this what you will.

“Canadian” films, not-so-Canadian stories


Alas, I pretty much missed the last few days of the Vancouver International Film Festival this week, but I hope to get a few capsule reviews up in the near future anyway. In the meantime, I think it’s worth noting how this year’s festival, perhaps unwittingly, underscored the ongoing question of what, exactly, constitutes a “Canadian” film.

The movie that opened the “Canadian Images” section of the festival two weeks ago was Stone of Destiny, which tells the true story of how a handful of Scots drove down to London in 1950 and stole the titular relic from Westminster Abbey. What is the Canadian connection, you ask? Well, it was produced with a bit of Canadian money, and writer-director Charles Martin Smith — best known perhaps for playing one of The Untouchables (1987), along with Kevin Costner, Sean Connery and Andy Garcia — happens to live and work in Vancouver. But that’s pretty much it. (For what it’s worth, though, one of the characters depicted in the film did move to Vancouver some years later; his widow was at the screening I attended.)

Meanwhile, the film that won the “Western Canada Feature Film Award” last night was Fifty Dead Men Walking, which tells the true story of how a member of the IRA saved a few dozen lives by leaking information to the Brits. What is the Canadian connection, you ask? Well, it was produced with a bit of Canadian money, and writer-director Kari Skogland comes from British Columbia. Even better, a brief prologue shows the former snitch living in hiding somewhere in Canada — but the rest of the movie, told as one giant flashback, still takes place in Belfast.

See the problem? If the purpose of promoting Canadian filmmakers — whether by giving them government grants or by devoting an entire festival series to them — is to help our artists to “tell our stories”, then these particular films wouldn’t quite seem to do the trick. They may be “Canadian” behind the camera, but in front of the camera, they tell basically Scottish or Irish stories instead.

Now, Canada certainly has a strong connection to the British Isles in general, and to its Celtic roots in particular, so it’s not surprising that we would have an affinity for stories like these. And there were certainly lots of other films at this festival which were indisputably Canadian on both sides of the camera. But it still seems a little odd to see these two particular films highlighted in this way.

Oh, how were the films themselves? Okay, but not great, I thought. Stone of Destiny is a bit rote and perfunctory in some ways, and shamelessly Scottish-nationalist to boot; but it tells a story I had never heard before, which has to count for something, and the night of the heist itself is an amusing series of errors and near-misses. Fifty Dead Men Walking is more of a jumble, with its relentlessly brutal depiction of Belfast’s streets, its seemingly indestructible protagonist, and its fitful explication of the political landscape; but it has its moments, too.

Billy: The Early Years — the review’s up!

My review of Billy: The Early Years is now up at CT Movies. I may post a slightly different version here later.