The Associated Press brings us the latest from Cairo:
Islamists approved a draft constitution for Egypt early Friday without the participation of liberal and Christian members, seeking to pre-empt a court ruling that could dissolve their panel with a rushed, marathon vote that further inflames the clash between the opposition and President Mohammed Morsi.
The move advanced a charter with an Islamist bent that rights experts say could give Muslim clerics oversight over legislation and bring restrictions on freedom of speech, women’s rights and other liberties…
The Islamist-dominated assembly that has been working on the constitution for months raced to pass it, voting article by article on the draft’s more than 230 articles for more than 16 hours. The lack of inclusion was on display in the nationally televised gathering: Of the 85 members in attendance, there was not a single Christian and only four women, all Islamists. Many of the men wore beards, the hallmark of Muslim conservatives.
For weeks, liberal, secular and Christian members, already a minority on the 100-member panel, have been withdrawing to protest what they call the Islamists’ hijacking of the process.
You should read the whole thing. It’s a lengthy piece with tons of reporting. I love how the reporters give specifics. So that’s your example of good reporting from Egypt.
I also wanted to highlight this piece by Time. Three reporters got a huge get — the chance to interview the man who just went “temporary dictator” on his country. He’s asserted that all his decisions are final, can’t be appealed, and can’t be overturned by courts. He’s further said that no judicial body can dissolve the assembly writing the new constitution.
So what do these three reporters ask the man who used to be the Muslim Brotherhood’s enforcer? Here’s what they came up with:
You’re on the world stage now.
What was it like to deal with president Obama during the Gaza cease-fire?
Is the Muslim Brotherhood in fact a democratic organization?
Last week’s decree created a lot of controversy. If you had it to do over again, would you handle it differently? Revise it?
This year, 2012, was a big year, a lot happened. Many hail you as a statesman, others warn you’re a new pharaoh.
Is there enough of a buy-in from the society at large on the constitution?
But what about the political environment around it? Don’t events of the last week indicate a society pulling part rather than coming together around it?
As the fourth question shows, this interview definitely took place this week — after the events of last week that provoked global outrage. Should I assume they were only allowed to ask questions that wouldn’t raise the ire of Morsy? What do you think of these questions?