Undogmatic doublet of dogma

Derrida’s philosophy is a tantalizing ghost of Judaism and/or Christianity, and that is no accident. In The Gift of Death, Second Edition & Literature in Secret (Religion and Postmodernism) , he places his work in the tradition of modern philosophy:

What “engenders” the Christian themes that surround the gift, he says, does not at all depend on “the event of a revelation or the revelation of an event.” The possibility of an event, not its actuality, is sufficient to sketch out the skeleton, and this is what “a certain” Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard, a certain Heidegger, Levinas, and Marion were all about: All “belong to this tradition that consists of proposing a nondogmatic doublet of dogma, a philosophical and metaphysical doublet, in any case a thinking that ‘repeats’ the possibility of religion without religion.”

And so you get: A messianism without a Messiah, eschatology without an end, gift without Giver, all the places filled with glassy placeholders.

"1. The Constitution is the law. The DoI isn't.2. Where did "defy God" come from? ..."

Here Comes the Judge
"You're serious? The Declaration of Independence "has zero power today?" When did SCOTUS junk that ..."

Here Comes the Judge
"No. "Unalienable rights" was a phrase from the Declaration of Independence. That document is important ..."

Here Comes the Judge
""unalienable rights" was the term in the Constitution for rights already existing, already given by ..."

Here Comes the Judge

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!