For Easy Poetry

“Once upon a time,” writes Anthony Madrid, “there were two traditions in Anglophone poetry. On the one hand, there was poetry that was completely easy to understand and whose elegance depended on translucent phrases and straightforward sentiments. On the other hand, there was the hard stuff: poetry where the reader had to concentrate intensely, because every line was supersaturated with subtle meanings and exotic, twisted-up diction/syntax.”

Not any more: “Ever since the later Elizabethans, the difficult tradition has utterly dominated poetry in English, to the point where what I’m calling ‘easy’ (things like Wyatt’s songs or Cavalier lyrics or old ballads or nine-tenths of Langston Hughes) seems like ‘light verse’ to many a shit-for-brains English major. Today, people pretty much assume poetry should not be easy to understand.”

Madrid is talking about Swift,. who could not take himself seriously as a poet. Like Burns, he was a “throwback” to another tradition, when poetry didn’t need to be opaque to be considered poetic.

 

"Geez, Dreher's article is ridiculous. Basically, persecution is coming. Persecution, of course, is defined as ..."

Persecution
"Do you truly believe that atheists, agnostics, or even non-Christians don't have a shared sense ..."

Liberalism’s Soul
"I have never heard of a Christian in America who desires persecution. I have read ..."

Persecution
"We have both fred and Carl nietztche. You can't separate the two they are dopplegangers. ..."

Poetics of Final Judgment

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment