Who Will Stand Up for The Incredibles?

No mainstream American film this year has earned a higher combination of critical acclaim and audience enthusiasm than The Incredibles.

So, why isn’t the film in the National Board of Review’s Top Ten of 2004?

Do they consider a film that can impress all ages to be unsophisticated?

What could possibly be the reason?

Will Oscar voters be sensible enough to recognize that an achievement on the scale of The Incredibles deserves honors not just in the animation category, but in the Best Picture of the Year category? Who’s going to have the guts to show that kind of sense?

And while we’re on the subject, if the NBR liked Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind enough to award it with the Best Screenplay of the Year … why isn’t THAT film in their Top Ten?

Is it lacking in the performances? (No. They’re award worthy.) Is it lacking in strong direction? (No. Michel Gondry delivered the most creative work by a director this year.) Is it the soundtrack? (No. John Brion’s soundtrack is superbly effective.) WHAT IS IT?

This all adds up to one clear conclusion: The National Board of Review members are not thinking very clearly.

  • Facebook
My 10,000th Tweet is An Announcement.
Over the Moon: A Critic in Top Form
Happy 5th Birthday, WALL•E!
The Incredibles (and Other 10-Year-Old Films); Jesus Films; Matt Zoller Seitz; Scott Cairns
About Jeffrey Overstreet

Jeffrey Overstreet departed the Patheos network in order to escape click-bait advertisements that were offending him and his readers. He will re-launch Looking Closer at lookingcloser.org soon. He is the author of The Auralia Thread, a four-volume fantasy series that begins with Auralia's Colors, and a memoir of "dangerous moviegoing" called Through a Screen Darkly. He teaches creative writing and film studies; speaks internationally about art and faith; served as Writer-in-Residence at Covenant College; and is employed by Seattle Pacific University as a project manager, copyeditor, and writer.