Obama to Troops: Shut up and Die

Congress steps up demands for info on Benghazi attack…
White House dodges…
FACEBOOK Censors Navy SEALS to Protect President…
‘The mysterious media Benghazi bugout’…
WASHPOST: ‘LINGERING QUESTIONS’…
LENO: ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell is back … Obama’s new policy for questions about Libya’…

If this guy were a Republican there would be screams for a Grand Jury investigation.  But our state-run media and Antiwar Left don’t care about our troops when the Greater Good is protecting Obama.

There’s a reason so many troops support Ron Paul.

"IMO, from this day forward, anybody who continues to support Trump is complicit in his ..."

Lying Mob Boss pauses to change ..."
"You're right and I struggle mightily with this and with the desire to see them ..."

Our Post-Satire Age
"Number 2 seems to be factually incorrect. As far as I can tell, the U.S. ..."

Lying Mob Boss pauses to change ..."
"Beyond calls to resist in the abstract, there have to be substantive material objectives.We’re here ..."

Lying Mob Boss pauses to change ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Scott

    But Ron Paul is not running for anything anymore. We need to get over it.

    • Typical American.

      You’re people are so screwed. I just wish you wouldn’t continue to destroy our country in the process…

    • Typical American.

      Your people are so screwed. I just wish you wouldn’t continue to destroy our country in the process…

    • ivan_the_mad

      That is hardly the point here.

    • Harold B.

      No – the point in saying “There is a reason so many troops support Ron Paul” is that the troops support Ron Paul because of his foreign policy. We need to adopt Ron Paul’s foreign policy is the point. We need to do this before we are the most hated country in the world because we keep going into other countries and killing their people (the fact that many are “accidents” does not help anything – taking a life is taking a life). We need a friendly, non-interventionist foreign policy now!

      • Ted Seeber

        “before”?

        I think we’re about 40 years too late, mate.

    • I suspect that next time around it’s going to be Rand Paul picking up dad’s standard. He might just do a better job at it.