Is Francis a Medjugorje Skeptic?

Hard to tell, but interesting if true.

Fr. Z comments.

"Yeah, but for some reason, you keep talking to me. You seem to not want ..."

Trump and Moore: They did Nazi ..."
"All of them. She clerked at both the Fed. Court of Appeals and the Supreme ..."

Trump and Moore: They did Nazi ..."
"Yes. Before joining SCOTUS, Elena Kagan was Solicitor General and a law professor. How many ..."

Trump and Moore: They did Nazi ..."
"MUST WATCH: Republican @SenJohnKennedy asks one of @realDonaldTrump’s US District Judge nominees basic questions of ..."

Trump and Moore: They did Nazi ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • http://sperolaus.com/ David Rummelhoff

    One of the most obvious screening tests for authenticity of any apparition is that it doesn’t violate the Church’s teaching. Now, I know very little of Medjugoje, so this isn’t an indictment of that apparition per se. However, given that the Church has constantly taught that general revelation ceased with the passing of the Apostles, it follows that any apparition claiming to provide revelation that is in any way binding on all Christians is a false apparition. Relevant to all, fine, but not binding.

  • Oct13

    Status of Medjugorje: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_response_to_the_Medjugorje_apparitions

    Dubious doctrines of Medjugorje:

    – September 13, 1981: Jesus is the Father
    – September 16, 1981: The visionaries don’t need to pray for themselves
    – August 31, 1982: Mary is not the Dispenser of all heavenly gifts