Universalism for a New Age

As I reflect on the evolution of Universalism in the West I find something rich and exciting.

It all, of course, starts with the peculiarities of religion in the West and the whole idea of a soul as something intertwined for a while with the body but is essentially not of the body, and with death goes on to something. Again, in the West, mainly within Christianity and Islam there’s a judgement day based certainly for the mainstream of Christianity and Islam not so much on what one has done in life, but what allegiances one has made, which team one has signed on to.

Western Christian Universalism is rooted in a rather different view of the deity. For Universalists the bottom line from then to now is a reconciling love. The major divides between the schools of Universalism have only been in whether there is a time for purification before that ultimate reconciliation.

Now, one harsh way of putting the original view was “all dead people go to heaven.” Boiled down it raises all the derision I think the whole idea of souls and heavens and hells deserve. Such a cosmos is one strange and nasty place. Okay, perhaps mirroring the strange and nasty within which we live. It is strange. And it is nasty.

But, it, this cosmos, our world, our lives, is also lovely beyond all calculation.

And I’m very much taken with the evolution of Universalism over time.

I think the next step is a realization that one story weird or whatever can’t quite encompass the great mess.

And that next Universalist impulse is that all religions are true.

For me there is a falling short here. I am totally with the impulse. But there’s a problem. All religions are not true. Or, at the very least, it is somewhere close to impossible to reconcile the core messages of all religions – even the five or seven, whatever your favorite count might be, so-called “world religions.”


And there is an emerging understanding for Universalism that makes a world of sense to me.

All religions contain that which is necessary to salvation.

(salvation as in salve: to heal. The heart of reconciliation. The heart of love.)

All is always problematic. But, as I cast my eye over these things, I see possibilities of heart, I see insights into the miracle of our manifestation into this world as individuals, and I see intimations of the great web that includes every one of us in something vast and terrible and lovely and true.

Here I think we see a Universalism that is a lamp hanging in front of us as we make our way through the night, casting a light, showing us a way.

Something good.

Something birthing hope into this world.

Something lovely.

(By the bye, full credit on the lovely illustration. It is the “Rhenberg Window” hung at the Rockford Unitarian Universalist Church, in Illinois.)

Smelling of the Zephyr
THE MIDDLE WAY OF LIBERAL RELIGION A Meditation on Unitarian Universalism’s Fourth Principle
We Speak No Americano
Of Kings and Priests: An Idle Aside With No Discernible Conclusion
  • erik wikstrom

    Beautiful . . .

  • Alex

    Very nice, James, and well summed up. I would add that insofar as we know as humans now, all truth we perceive is partial truth and ‘all’ religious and non-religious faith systems attempt to grapple with the essence of the universal by looking through a keyhole and trying to describe what they see of the world beyond it. I need more tea so will stop pontificating but with deep appreciation for your thoughts above.

  • http://www.boundlesswayzen.org jamesford

    yes, Alex, always through a glass darkly…

  • http://mymusingcorner.wordpress.com Lana

    Interesting but I have been under the impression that Buddhists do not believe in a soul passing from one life to the next (rather a consciousness) but hindus do. I’d love to hear your thoughts.

  • http://www.boundlesswayzen.org jamesford

    As far as Buddhism is concerned, there is no concept of a soul. In fact the idea of some essence is considered a cognitive error that leads to much of human suffering. But, the story doesn’t end there. Here’s an attempt at a brief explanation of the classic Buddhist view that spends more time on a modernist or “liberal” Buddhist interpretation of core Buddhist doctrines that touch on this issue. http://www.boundlesswayzen.org/teishos/libbudteisho.html I go into greater detail in my book “If You’re Lucky, Your Heart Will Break.”