Enns Responds to DeYoung about Historical Adam

Pete Enns has responded to Kevin DeYoung’s post offering ten reasons for believing in a historical Adam. Like me, Pete is not impressed, and he interacts with my response in the process of articulating his own. Click through to read it!

Stay in touch! Like Religion Prof on Facebook:

Was God Good Before Creation?
First Review of Theology and Science Fiction
Made in the Image of God
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton: Perspectives from Science and Science Fiction