A Low View of Scripture

Mike Beidler posted this as his status update on Facebook and I asked for permission to quote him:

To say that if any part of the Bible is of the myth genre, so goes the rest, is to present a blatantly false dichotomy. Disregarding the fact that Genesis contains etiological literature (i.e., origins myth) is actually a “low view” of Scripture. It disrespects the text(s), outright censors the ancient voices that produced the text(s), disregards authorial intent, and is guilty of the worst forms of theological ventriloquism.

"Maybe the historical evidence is best explained by the miraculous explanation that, for instance, Cephas ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
"My point has nothing to do with philosophy or any of its sub-disciplines (other perhaps ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
""For example, N.T. Wright, who is considered a leading authority on Paul, writes books defending ..."

Gaps in Jesus’ Fossil Record?
"Well if you don't mind I could use some help with someone else; https://disqus.com/by/shepv...Namely his ..."

Star Trek Discovery: Choose Your Pain

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • http://brgulker.wordpress.com/ brgulker

    Theological ventriloquism. I like that turn of phrase.

    • http://www.rethinkingao.com Mike Beidler

      It was inspired by my search to find a phrase equivalent to “putting words in the biblical authors’ mouths.” :)