A Low View of Scripture

Mike Beidler posted this as his status update on Facebook and I asked for permission to quote him:

To say that if any part of the Bible is of the myth genre, so goes the rest, is to present a blatantly false dichotomy. Disregarding the fact that Genesis contains etiological literature (i.e., origins myth) is actually a “low view” of Scripture. It disrespects the text(s), outright censors the ancient voices that produced the text(s), disregards authorial intent, and is guilty of the worst forms of theological ventriloquism.

"Specs in Genesis? This is it:“14 Make yourself an ark of cypress wood; make rooms ..."

Ark Encounter is not a Shrine ..."
"The key word is “graphic”. I haven’t been to the ark encounter, but I would ..."

Ark Encounter is not a Shrine ..."
"I don't have cable or dish, so I'm behind the times on TV land. But ..."

Ark Encounter is not a Shrine ..."
"One last thought on the possible portrayal of Jesus as greater than the Caesar's:Craig Koester’s ..."

Happy Easter!

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Theological ventriloquism. I like that turn of phrase.

    • It was inspired by my search to find a phrase equivalent to “putting words in the biblical authors’ mouths.” 🙂