Literal or Symbolic?

On Reddit I came across this wonderful bit of wisdom about interpreting the Bible, from an individual whose user name is SleetTheFox:

“Whatever is supposed to be literal I interpret literal. Whatever is supposed to be symbolic I interpret symbolic. Whatever I have mischaracterized the intended meaning of, I interpret incorrectly.”

That pretty much sums it up. Perhaps it needs to be turned into a song – “What does Sleet the Fox say?”

 

"The key word is “graphic”. I haven’t been to the ark encounter, but I would ..."

Ark Encounter is not a Shrine ..."
"I don't have cable or dish, so I'm behind the times on TV land. But ..."

Ark Encounter is not a Shrine ..."
"One last thought on the possible portrayal of Jesus as greater than the Caesar's:Craig Koester’s ..."

Happy Easter!
"And there may be reason to suppose the early Christians were directly concerned with establishing ..."

Happy Easter!

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Marta L.

    Love the honesty in this.

  • markhh

    As a sincere question to help me learn how to think about this stuff – doesn’t the word “should” require either an authority or external standard to apply?

    • Are you referring to the “supposed to be”? There is definitely some deliberate irony there, I think, since the last sentence makes clear that which is “supposed to be” which is not something that a reader is always correct about, by whatever standard that may be measured.