Literal or Symbolic?

On Reddit I came across this wonderful bit of wisdom about interpreting the Bible, from an individual whose user name is SleetTheFox:

“Whatever is supposed to be literal I interpret literal. Whatever is supposed to be symbolic I interpret symbolic. Whatever I have mischaracterized the intended meaning of, I interpret incorrectly.”

That pretty much sums it up. Perhaps it needs to be turned into a song – “What does Sleet the Fox say?”

 

"I have insisted absolutely nothing of the kind. I have responded to your claim that ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
"I don't think anyone is arguing the "nickname" argument is impossible like a "square circle" ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
"That is not the point. The issue is that you keep insisting that the meaning ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer
"We don't if we are responding to an argument that something is impossible. In that ..."

Earl Doherty as Christian Reformer

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Marta L.

    Love the honesty in this.

  • markhh

    As a sincere question to help me learn how to think about this stuff – doesn’t the word “should” require either an authority or external standard to apply?

    • http://www.patheos.com/blogs/religionprof/ James F. McGrath

      Are you referring to the “supposed to be”? There is definitely some deliberate irony there, I think, since the last sentence makes clear that which is “supposed to be” which is not something that a reader is always correct about, by whatever standard that may be measured.