Winehouse, Norway, PB, and a truly Global Digital Library… What a week.

Yea, it’s been a tough one.

In better news, this guy may be the heroic answer to much recent discussion on the digital sharing/stealing of books, a stunning new project to create a global public library:

Like Google Books, it would have as its goal the eventual digitization of human culture, preserving the works of the world’s authors, scholars, artists, and entertainers and making them widely available. Unlike Google Books, however, this library would not be operated by a for-profit company. It would be accessible to any person, in any place, at any time, at no cost.

And for those who fear for the future of books in the digital age:

One thing we have learned from the new discipline known as “the history of the book” is that one means of communication does not displace another. Manuscript publishing actually expanded after the invention of printing by movable type, and it continued to flourish for three centuries after Gutenberg. Instead of lamenting “the death of the book,” I believe we should celebrate new possibilities of combining the printed codex with electronic technology . . . .The information ecology is getting richer, not thinner.

This is good news. And now on to the rest.

Regarding Miss Winehouse, we must hope that her suffering has ended, and that -should there be a rebirth- a more fortunate circumstance can come. The article linked above lists some other legends who died at 27, far, far too young. And no doubt a sign that their suffering was not alone, not simply due to some personal flaw or character defect. Instead it points to the heart of our hyper-pressurized society of success, reward, and failure.

Buddhists are taught not to cling to success, or fear failures. These are but two of the ‘worldly conditions’ we are supposed to see with a sense of equanimity and freedom:

Gain and loss, lābho ca, alābho ca,
fame and obscurity , yaso ca, ayaso ca, 

Yet it is all too human of us that we still do. We praise the famous and successful amongst us, and we censure those we disagree with or disapprove of.  This fact was used against me recently when I suggested that we (in the 1st world) live pretty easy lives compared to most people out there. Heart disease, cancer, stress, depression – illnesses we deem preventable and yet are widespread, and which are much rarer and at times unheard of in other societies. Add to them alcoholism and drug addictions, problems that are relatively new to the Western world and are spreading in all directions (including more deeply and broadly into our own societies)…

Hopefully now we will look more compassionately on those with illnesses such as addictions and try to help them as well as we can. The ignorant impetus is to turn away and say “it’s his/her own fault.” But a clearer perspective reveals that there is so much more to it than that.

Similarly with the killing spree in Norway. News outlets in England (and beyond no doubt) seized on the utterly unfounded notion that this may be another Islamic fundamentalist attack on a Western nation (my thanks to Dave W for the link). Apparently the killer had contacted some Muslim group – probably to threaten them from what I’ve read – but media outlets didn’t pay much attention and misled many people. Apparently he had also cited J.S. Mill and visited London regarding reestablishing the Knights Templar as well, but none of this caught the media’s attention as much as the word muslim.

Please watch the video below, and do so knowing that we all have a responsibility to counteract such ignorant and violent rhetoric. I recall that when the 9/11 attacks hit the US, many people blamed Jews, with elaborate conspiracy plots, almost always based on the Protocols of Zion. This ‘book‘ was another Ethics Bowl case I worked on way back when. It’s a long story. Check out the wiki link and the film though.

And watch this below knowing that like the ‘book’ about Jews attempting to take over the world, this piece of work is composed by xenophobic, violent racists and that all ‘facts’ or historical information should be compared with reputable sources.