Beware— 'The Ides of March'

Beware— 'The Ides of March' October 19, 2011

George Clooney likes politically themed movies.  And he has done some fine ones in the past  (see Good Night, and Good Luck).  And this particular movie, just released, is set in northern Kentucky and Cinci,  Kentucky being George’s home turf.    The scenario is plausible, the setting is a primary (finally a movie that has good timing), and the cast is absolutely an A list cast.   Furthermore the plot is tight, and it has several twists and turns.   What’s not to like?  Well frankly, almost all of the persons in the story itself, who range from arrogant to conniving to cowardly to sinister, to positively wicked.  Welcome to politics as we know it ( in the dictionary the word politics is now filed under the word ‘dirty’ as a synonym).  For an hour and 38 minutes we follow the trail of a young bright up and coming campaign staffer for one Governor Morris of Pennsylvania and the questions which keep popping into one’s head is—- Do I like any of these people, why should I care about them, and are these really the kinds of people we end up voting for?

Let’s talk about the cast first—- George Clooney, up and comer Ryan Gosling (see the review of ‘Drive’ earlier on this blog), Paul Giamatti, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Marisa Tomei, and Evan Rachel Woods as the young staffer that ‘Steven’ (.e. Gosling) falls for.  Gosling is once again excellent and as in the movie ‘Drive’ we have lots of close camera shots of him. The story really revolves around him, and his decision-making good and bad.  In this movie at least he gets to talk, quite a good deal, unlike in ‘Drive’.  The real stroke of brilliance in casting is pitting Giamatti vs.  Hoffman as rival campaign managers, roles they fill well and play to the hilt.  We could have used more tete a tete from them.   This is indeed a male dominated movie, with both Woods and Tomei playing lesser, but nonetheless effective roles.  We could have used more from them.

On the whole Clooney’s directing is very good, and his acting is even better,  though considering the view of the candidate he plays (he’s a pro-choice Democrat who is neither Christian nor Muslim nor Jew nor Atheist, his real religion is he believes in the U.S. Constitution; he is for weening ourselves off of foreign oil by promoting alternative sources of cleaner energy), one suspects it’s type casting to a certain degree— Clooney is playing himself if he was running for some office.

Full marks to the stylish work of the cinematographer, as this movie is worth watching just for the use of light and shadow and nuance and color.  It is no accident so many scenes are in darkness or shades of gray, just like the behind the scenes dirty politics that are going on.  Furthermore, the film is set in winter, perhaps late winter, but nonetheless not spring— heading for the Ides of March in chilly Cinci on the river.

So why that title?  Perhaps you know Shakespeare and behind that the actual story of Julius Caesar who was indeed killed on the Ides of March.  But the story of Caesar is the story of assassinating a man whom people were sure longed to be king, even Emperor.   There is no such assassination  forthcoming in this film, just a threatened character assassination.

What one learns along the way however is that the quality valued above all others on the campaign trail is neither truth nor integrity nor high moral ideals, but rather just loyalty.  Loyalty through thick and thin.  Loyalty through lies and cheating. Loyalty over truth and integrity.   You see this film really is  au courant.  It speaks of and too the ethos of our nation today, where the civic religion is stronger than the sacred religion,  where ‘just win baby’ is the motto, over ‘it matters how you play the game’, where a man who is cynical about God and the Christian faith can get elected on the basis of moxy and savvy and slick talk and above all ‘a can do’ attitude.   Some movies are morality plays, others, especially ones about politics, are immorality plays, and that is what we have in this film.  The marvel is that we care at all about these people.  A plague on both their houses.

If it is true in this campaign season that America gets the candidates we deserve, then now is the winter of our discontent, our dirty politics mirror our dirty souls.  This film is well worth seeing just because it gives us a chance to take a good hard look at ourselves in the mirror.  It has an R rating due to the ‘F’ word showing up so frequently,  and is not ‘family friendly’.  But then, our culture is no longer very family friendly, having managed to redefine the words marriage and family to  suit our new standards of what counts as moral or immoral.

Browse Our Archives

error: Content is protected !!