Ben. Both Melanchthon and Calvin in their Romans commentaries rely on rhetorical analysis of the structure of the letter. How important do you think understanding their use of rhetoric is to understanding their theological observations on things like justification? Stephen. There are some interesting differences between Melanchthon and Calvin in their rhetorical analysis, but there is no doubt that for each there is a relationship between it and their theological observations. Calvin’s analysis is simpler and has had the greater... Read more

Ben. Perhaps it is just my not understanding your language, but at various points in Part One, you talk about ‘the Holy Spirit speaking through’ Paul or others. And, for instance, on p. 34 you say “the main event is thus not Paul’s thoughts as such, but rather what the Holy Spirit has said through Paul. The goal of theological interpretation of Scripture is to explicate that speaking of the Spirit.” It seems to me that the Spirit speaks ‘in’... Read more

Ben. I took Romans with Stendahl at Harvard. What I’ve often wondered, since he was of Scandavian extract, is whether he read Paul through Kierkegaard, hence the Introspective Conscience stuff—- What do you think? Stephen. I confess I don’t know enough about Kierkegaard to be able to answer this question. I do know, however, what I believe is the fundamental problem with Stendahl’s focus on the introspective conscience. He claims that Luther’s struggles with his conscience have been projected back... Read more

Ben: Full disclosure at the outset, I’m not persuaded by some of the major tenants of either Luther or Calvin about some of these things, but rather am a child of the Wesleys and the English revival of the 18th century. Nevertheless, I’ve spent a good deal of time in Luther and Calvin both at GCTS, and then I did Calvin and Luther with T.H.L. Parker at Durham when I was there. So’ I’m familiar with a good deal of... Read more

Certainly one of the best books of the year that deals with both the New Testament and Protestant Reformation theology is Stephen Chester’s excellent study— Reading Paul with the Reformers, (Eerdmans, 2017, 500 pages). What is especially impressive about this study is that Chester is equally skilled in two different disciplines. He’s no one trick pony. This post begins a dialogue that will carry on through the rest of this month. Enjoy— BW3 —- Ben: First of all thanks Stephen... Read more

Some have viewed God as having to forfeit his righteous demands in order to be able to forgive. Nothing could be further from the truth. It is precisely because God will always do what he has promised and at the same time do and be what is right that he forgives. C.H. Dodd puts it quite eloquently: God’s attitude to us, His purposes for us, do not alter because we sin against Him. When we turn to Him again, we... Read more

Just in case you forgot who won the National Championship last year and barely missed out winning two years ago as well—- Ram On! Read more

 Read more

I’m pleased to say my course is now available from Logos/Faithlife on Kingdom perspectives on the Christian life. Check it out. https://logos.wistia.com/medias/zu6r3uuwp9?embedType=iframe&seo=false&videoFoam=true&videoWidth=640 https://logos.wistia.com/medias/zu6r3uuwp9?embedType=iframe&seo=false&videoFoam=true&videoWidth=640 Read more

My last year at UNC (1974) ‘Murder on the Orient Express’ showed up on the silver screen. It was not bad, but I didn’t really like the foppish way Hercule Poirot, the detective genius, was portrayed. He seemed one part Peter Sellers and one part Columbo, an odd combo n’est pas? By contrast, Ridley Scott’s excellent remake of this classic story is quite excellent. Kenneth Branagh gets the detective just right— eccentric, brilliant, and a decent chap in the bargain.... Read more