Church and ministry leadership resources to better equip, train and provide ideas for today's church and ministry leaders, like you.
Get updates from Bristol Palin delivered straight to your inbox
My baby is the cutest, cutest, boy ever!!!
Read more on the (new and improved) Patheos Faith and Family Channel!
Also, fan me on Facebook and follow this blog on Twitter!
Sure cute! you have a wonderful and perfect family bristol!
ANd you are a perfect person!
No one’s perfect; we grow each day 🙂 However, I will say that few could weather all the slander and crap Bristol has and look as good, let alone remain kind and content. THis woman is perfectly justified in calling herself a victim but she’s never played that card – because she’s strong.
I dont see anything bad about Sarah and Bristol! they are perfect people!!
Are you kidding? She plays the victim card all the time. You clearly haven’t read her past posts.
What are you talking about? Playing victim is asking for pity. She’s never asked for pity even though she’s one of the most slandered person out there. She voices a difference in opinion occasionally but doesn’t attack the other side. She comes across as real in a world where too many put up a facade and pretend they are all-knowing beings who live to judge everyone else. She could very well only show the positive, lovey side of parenting where the day ends with cuddles and prayers. She chooses to show people that life is hard and parenting is reacting to the unexpected and less ideal. In a world where too many young people think a baby is all coos and smiles and playdates, I’m proud of Bristol for being real and unafraid of reality as a calm and focused mom whose son comes first in her life.
Instead of being an internet bully, something Bristol has successfully ignored, why not choose to see the positive, Jeff? Tripp clearly is adored, well-cared for, and a happy boy who is never without family love or something to do. His very presence ensures Sarah’s equally cherished younger son will always have a permanent sidekick and protector. Despite enduring a “lost in life” ex who made egregious decisions and “penned” a libelous book (even after hurtful, pointless, nasty interviews. And said ex won’t even acknowledge how shitty he acted), Bristol will slowly keep forgiving and forgetting. The past really doesn’t matter. She’s never feigned perfection, and she’s owned past mistakes, living like tomorrow’s always fresh. What’s to hate about that?
You really should get a life Rosie.
Pot, meet kettle.
Glad to hear you can admit that about yourself. Acknowledgment is the first step to mental health. Good luck on making it through the rest of them.
😉 I hope one day you can smile and see beauty in the world, instead of imposing your inner hate on the world.
Brilliant response Rosie! Kill them with kindness and just a hint of sarcasm. I know conservatives have low self-esteem and need to feel like they won… so congratulations you WIN!
you Liberals are the only true haters here!
There’s nothing sarcastic about my comments here. But I’m enjoying your projection.
I have read her past posts! and she is a victim it are you liberals that are hating on her all the time!
Tripp is cute and lucky … lucky to be a member of the Palin Family.
Get that kid an agent! He can earn his own college money!!! 😀
handsome little guy……..he’s a mini you
He certainly is, Bristol. To be honest, I prefer Tripp’s hair shorter. Showcases his beautiful face better. But he does have gorgeous locks. Tripp is truly blessed with the Palin genes.
He looks more like his father. What on earth are you smoking?
No one thinks its concerning for a celebrity like Bristol to constantly post pictures of her son? Most celebrities protect their children so they aren’t harmed or have to deal with paparazzi. Why would anyone on earth specifically put their innocent child in the spotlight? We should have NO idea what he looks like.
Hey lonely, how’s your favorite pervert, Mr Anthony Weiner doing? Did the therapy help? I see y’all are itching to interfere in the “internal affairs of other countries” (Syria). You are killing defenseless babies through abortion and infanticide here in America, suddenly you want to get into a war with Syria over the “killing of defenseless babies”, you hypocrites. What happened to “make love, not war”? I told you, you liberals are the biggest hypocrites that have ever walked on the face of the earth.
There really is nothing O’warmongerer won’t do for his Muslim Brotherhood buddies.
What does any of your babbling have to do with Bristol being bad mother?
Hey I can go off on a tangent too….Bristol’s child looks like a serial killer…probably the glasses.
I see you don’t want to talk about your pervert “leaders”. Instead you choose to smear a clean as the wind-driven snow young mother and her son. Lowlife liberal, you just shown the world who you really are. Btw, all serial killers in the history of America were registered Democrats.
I think Jeff’s comment was an attempt at humor, but was in poor taste. Perhaps your last sentence about all serial killers being Dems was too??? But just in case it’s not, I’d point out that Ted Bundy and BTK killers are/were Repubs. I just wasted 5 mins of my life on this ridonkulousness!
” I just wasted 5 mins of my life on this ridonkulousness!” It IS a waste of your life to defend a psycho who said something so hateful about a little child. Defending little Tripp is not a waste of time for me.
Pardon me for not understanding the sick humor of the leftists, what kind of a person make that kind of a joke about a little child.
The majority of serial killers were/are Democrats, I dare to say. Heck, Democrats think it is noble and tolerant to support the murder of the pre-born and newborn! So pardon me for thinking the worst of them! I saw a picture of Democrat Activist and serial killer John Wayne Gracy with then First Lady Carter.
Interesting how you did not come to Tripp’s defense when the leftist said he looks like a serial killer, but you were so quick to come to the defense of your precious Democrats when something similar is said about them. Why do Democrats hate children?
If she posted a picture of him wearing big shoes and a red nose I would say he looks like a clown. get over yourself.
The point being…NONE Of us really should have any idea what he looks like. All we hear from people like you is how battered poor Bristol and her family are…constantly attacked and hated for no good reason. If this were true…why would she post PICTURES of her child? Wouldn’t she protect him to the highest degree possible? You can’t have it both ways…all though I know CONSERVATIVES expect so.
No, sicko, she should not have to hide her child from the world – perverts like you should not be allowed to roam free on the internet or anywhere else.
There would be pics of him anyway. Bristol has decided to control the situation and post pics of him of her choosing. She’s not your typical celebrity; paparazzi aren’t following her all over the place. Millions of people post pics of their kids on Facebook, etc. She just doing the same thing.
Oh I agree MR…many people post pics of their children…but those people don’t also post about how persecuted they are all the time. If Bristol can’t take the heat she can live her life very peacefully and quietly. Can you imagine if the Kardashians or Miley Cyrus had a blog and complained about all the “meanies” on the internet? Its ridiculous.
Oh stop whining, hater. The children of those people are not targeted by lowlifes like you because they are liberals.
Bristol and her family are not going to run and hide just because sickos like you are allowed to roam free – you are the one that can’t take the heat.
Any minute now you’ll be throwing a tantrum about “meanie” Christians.
Your mental illness showed – live with it.
I think involving kids in your insult is in poor taste. But Jeff’s comment was more ridiculous than offensive. His point was “I, too, can make ridiculous unfounded statements.” As someone who used to wear glasses (Thank-you, Lasik!!), should I have been offended about his “maybe it’s the glasses” comment? No, b/c it was ridiculous. BTW, were you outraged when someone on this blog (I forget which post) called Obama’s kids Malaria and Sharia?
And you can dare to say whatever you wish about the political leanings of serial killers- I’m not wasting any more of my time on such nonsense. If you wish to do so, feel free to post the statistics (but don’t cherry-pick). A common thread of many of your posts is that liberals/Dems are sociopaths, psychopaths, demented, etc. I wish you could accept that “normal” people can have different ideologies.
Really, and he had to say something hateful about an innocent child to make his baseless point?
He responded to my calling out the hypocrisy of liberals re: interfering in the affairs of other countries, Obama wanting to attack Syria, etc. What about that was ridiculous and unfounded? The truth hurts? Asking him about pervert Weiner, that offended y’all, not the hate and vile thrown at Bristol’s innocent son and her family day in and day out by haters, of which your buddy Jeff is the biggest, here on her website?
I were not here when that was said about Obama’s children, and if it is true, whoever said that is a despicable person. From what I have seen about liberal trolls, it is the kind of thing they come up with – I will not be surprised – they are called “mobys” they pretend to be conservatives and say hateful things to make conservatives look bad. So many examples of leftists doing that, I don’t know where to start. But whoever said that, shame on that person. The Palin family and none of her supporters that I have encountered in life and on the internet approve of that kind of hate towards children or anyone.
I guess you pretend to not see the vile things they ( your fellow liberals) say about the Palins and other posters here, they (the liberals you defend) ARE demented! (Btw, your friend Jeff called me a loon – double standard much?)You must be honest, the trolls are deranged, Bristol supporters never sink to their level.
I love to irritate them with the truth, while trying not to sink to their level.
Are you a Christian Melory4?
You should be lecturing your fellow liberals who hate Sarah and her family with a passion because they have a different ideology.
I rightly call them demented because that is the behavior they display by constantly harassing the Palins – they are not normal people, normal people don’t spend their time on the website of the people they hate. Normal people don’t obsess with people who disagree with them, like y’all do with the Palins. Normal people don’t make sick jokes about little children, you want me to continue?
If someone said the little grandchild of a prominent Democrat politician looks like a serial killer, you would not be so understanding, you would not be defending that person.
Btw, it is wrong to say that kind of thing about a little child, regardless of who his/her parents are. Outside the liberal bubble, no-one can appreciate that kind of joke.
Context is everything. The context of this was that it was ridiculous. Look at Tripp’s pic. He is the picture of cuteness. He is the exact OPPOSITE of what you would imagine a serial killer to look like (although, in truth, they can look like anyone, so you can’t really even look like a serial killer.) When my niece was a baby, my mother crocheted for her a white cape/blanket with an attached hood that came to a point on top. When she wore it, I used to JOKINGLY call her my little clan (as in KKK) baby. (Yes, maybe in poor taste, but the world was less PC back then. And its ridiculousness was what made it funny to me.) But if Facebook had been around then, I would have never posted a pic of her in it and called her that. People might have thought I was serious — they might not have understood that I was making fun of my Mom’s crocheting more than anything else.
To your other point, both Sarah and Bristol have freely accessible public blogs/Facebook. They both attract adoring fans who think they can do no wrong, and folks on the other side who think they do everything wrong.
The lengths you would go to defend this psycho. As I said, only a liberal can appreciate this sick humor. Judging from the hateful things they have said about Bristol, her son and her family, there is no doubt that this creep meant what he/she said.
At least I don’t have to explain to normal people how sick your “joke” is. Btw ,Jeff/ishy was not joking, you are the one that pretend that it was a joke.
You liberals can dish it out, but you can’t take it. Your side brought up serioal killers – in regards to a little child! That did not bother you, in fact you are still defending it.
Don’t throw this kind of garbage at a little child and complain when it is thrown right back at, in this instance, a corrupt stinking political party!
I will dare to say whatever I want about the political leanings of serial killers, you don’t get to tell me how and when to do it. No-one asked you to respond to it, in fact, if you were not so quick to defend your stinking Dem party, but not the little child, there would not have been any more discussion on the issue. .
You are not a great man if you cannot bow to a child, a wise man said.
Bottomline: If you don’t want to hear about serial killers, maybe your side should not bring up serial killers?
Oh, Please! What part of “in poor taste” did you not understand? But as your heroine said when Rush Limbaugh doubled down on the using the R-word, “it’s satire.” Speaking of Rush, he has a history of making fun of the daughters of Democratic Presidents (Amy Carter, Chelsea Clinton, and the Obama kids.) John McCain also made a mean joke about Chelsea Clinton. So it’s not just “lowlife liberals” who make public jokes about kids.
Rush never made fun of Obama’s kids. He never came close to saying any of the children you mentioned look like serial killers. See the Dem leader who wished a slow and painful death on the children of Cruz’s speech writer and you wonder why they say liberalism is a mental disorder.
Your continued defense of the sicko cancelled out the weak slap on the wrist you gave him.
(Thank-you for editing out the “liar” in your original post. I wasn’t even going to reply except for that.)
Rush illustrates absurdity by being absurd. That is why liberals always get it wrong and make fools of themselves when their heads explodes over things Rush have not said. If you want to hate on the guy at least listen to his show, so next time you know what you are talking about. Michelle did say her daughters are fat, go lecture her. Hearing Rush using her own words to make his point hopefully helped her in understanding how absurd it is for her to tell the country/world that her daughters are fat.
Excellent debating tactic Rush used in both instances, how would Obama feel if his daughters are groped by TSA agents, excellent and valid questions. Perhaps the most powerful man and leader of the free world can think about Rush’s question and do something about the TSA rules that allow for children to be touched inappropriately by TSA agents – it is all about the children, Dems always tell us. Disgusting spin (not surprising) by the leftist (link you posted) who reported on the matter.
Still, show me the conservative that wished a slow and painful death on the children of opponents or compared them to serial killers… I can give you evidence galore or liberals doing that.
I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree. I took Jeff the Sock Puppet’s comments exactly the way you took Rush’s. He was pointing out the previous poster’s absurdity by being absurd. For the record, I wasn’t “hating on” Rush- just pointing out that he did make fun of Obama’s kids. And I do listen to Rush (not often, but occasionally). Michelle O. did not call her kids fat; look up the quote- too long to copy here. And his point was about healthcare; he just threw in the fat comment as a jab, not to point out MO’s absurdity. (And he’s also commented on MO’s and Hillary’s Clinton’s weight as well, although in fairness, many folks make fun of his weight as well.)
Agree to agree to disagree :), but:
Only problem, the “previous poster’s” remarks were not absurd, but truth. Jeff could not deny that, so typical coward he chose to attack the little child. When Tripp reads Jeff’s comment, all he knows is that someone said he looks like a serial killer in his glasses. That is the kind of remark that can scar a little child for life. Remember how my remarks about the political leanings of serial killers offended you. Imagine how hurt Tripp and his family would be reading Jeff’s comment on his mom’s blog. There is no justification for what the psycho said, and you know that. You are too smart to believe what you are trying to sell in defense of a fellow liberal.
In closing, Jeff’s modus operandi is to hurt the Palins, see it in his every post, so sorry, good luck convincing anyone he did not mean to hurt with his comment.
yes MR of course I was just joking…in direct response to the ludicrous claims of melory(pickanumber).
as you well know actual facts don’t work on people like her. they bounce right off.
“as you well know actual facts don’t work on people like her. they bounce right off” hilarious – stop looking in the mirror ole Jeff!
Saying a little child looks like a serial killer is so funny – all the liberal lunatics are laughing their heads off. The kind of joke only the mentally ill can appreciate.
Clean as the “wind-driven snow”? HA HA HA HA HA HA.
The histerical laugh of the demented!
O’warmongerer?? Ha! That’s a new one. Many on “your side” have criticized Obama for not interfering in Iran and Syria a few years ago. And many on the left are not crazy about interfering in Syria. I would love to hear a coherent statement from Palin on Syria, and then we could discuss. (She is, after all, supposedly considering a Senate run, so she should be thinking about these issues.) But, no, pretty much all we get from her are trivialized and politicized comments like until we get a stronger leader, “Let Allah sort ’em out”.
How ’bout a coherent statement from the Nobel Peace prize winner and POTUS? Why do you care about the opinion of a “nobody” like Sarah Palin? What has she ever done to you liberals – tell the truth about your stinking policies? She has no power to send our troops into harms way, O’warmongerer has.
Politicized, that is funny coming from a Democrat. Even your own Mr Kucinich said O’warmongerer is wanting to attack Syria for political reasons, ask him what he meant.
First, Sarah P. has done nothing to me personally. But she is a public political figure and commentator, and a potential Senate and Presidential candidate, so I’d like to see her go beyond one-liners and discuss the issue in depth. Second, I am not and have never been a Kucinich fan, so I really don’t care what he says; he a flake. But I think if Obama does decide to launch a targeted attack on Syria, it will at least be a carefully thought-out decision. The UK, Israel, France, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia appear to be supporting an attack. Are their leaders all warmongers too? Honestly, I don’t envy the President in this decision at all; there are no good options. Even if you believe his decision is purely political (which I don’t), that’s not even easy– this doesn’t fall along party lines.
Really, I wish you would hold Obama, who is actually in power and who has the country in a huge mess, to the same standard you hold Sarah who may or may not run for office. She does discuss issues in depth – there is none so deaf as those who would not hear.
My problem is with the hypocrisy of Obama, Kerry and Biden – they lashed out at Bush when he had to make similar decisions – now they are threatening to attack without having all the information, and without even discussing and getting Congress approval, the hypocrisy stinks to high heaven.
Obama sends our military into harms way with their hands tied behind their backs, that is my problem with him – he wants them to fight in a PC manner – either they go in to win – or don’t go to war at all.
Also, every country in the ME that Obama got involved in turned into a mess – his agenda seems to be to pave the way for the Muslim Brotherhood to take over the ME.
Why don’t you save the paranoid delusions until the President actually does something in Syria you loonbag.
Hi, to my favorite loonbag, Jeff!
Why don’t you stay out of discussions about issues you know nothing about. Go on, smear the Palins, that is all you are good at, loonbag!
I hold Obama to a much higher standard than Palin, b/c he is our President. And I agree with you about the hypocrisy, but it’s not limited to Obama & Co. Candidates always make campaign promises they cannot (or will not) keep. Remember Bush not being into nation-building? Palin supporting path to citizenship? I’m sure when you become President, your point of view inevitably changes. And yes, I think they should be questioned about their flip-flops. But I also think we should be more interested in what they think now, as opposed to 7 yrs ago.
I do think Obama should call Congress back into session on the Syria issue, although technically I don’t think he has to; since it’s not a war.
In Egypt, we did not force Mubarek out; we tried to help him see the writing on the wall. We did not send combat troops to any country in the ME, and there is not plan to send them into Syria.
I don’t agree with every foreign policy decision Obama makes; I just disagree with you on his intent. I also think that he has much more info than either of us do, and devotes much more time (in between golf games- there, I said it for you) on this issue than either of us. Time will tell whether whatever decision he makes is right.
Yes, we were ever so subtle – Obama and his Arab Spring – now the ME is on fire – and if you think it can’t get any worse in Sirya, wait till Obama of “Morsi and Benghazi- fame” gets involved.
How the libs scorned the Right when they made some of the arguments you are making now. But I understand what you are saying, always nice talking to you.
Since you are holding Obama to such a high standard, don’t you agree that we need to know where he was during the 7-9 hours of the Benghazi attack. You know how you guys went ballistic because Bush spent a few more minutes with the children in the class room so as to not upset them, given the horrific news he had just received.
Seeing how you Democrats hijacked MLK’s I have a Dream – what better time to point out who these racists really are:
“When former president Jimmy Carter accuses the opponents of Barrack Obama’s policy of nationalizing broad aspects of our economy and spending us into bankruptcy of being “racists,” perhaps he should look in the mirror. In his 1982 book, Keeping Faith, Carter disingenuously said he “was not directly involved in the early struggles to end racial discrimination.” No kidding — in fact, he directly and unambiguously supported segregation. When Carter returned to Plains, Georgia, to become a peanut farmer after serving in the Navy, he became a member of the Sumter County School Board, which did not implement the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision handed down by the Supreme Court. Instead, the board continued to segregate school children on the streets of Carter’s hometown.
As Laughlin McDonald, director of the ACLU’s Voting Project, relates in his book A Voting Rights Odyssey: Black Enfranchisement in Georgia, Carter’s board tried to stop the construction of a new “Elementary Negro School” in 1956. Local white citizens had complained that the school would be “too close” to a white school. As a result, “the children, both colored and white, would have to travel the same streets and roads in order to reach their respective schools.” The prospect of black and white children commingling on the streets on their way to school was apparently so horrible to Carter that he requested that the state school board stop construction of the black school until a new site could be found. The state board turned down Carter’s request because of “the staggering cost.” Carter and the rest of the Sumter County School Board then reassured parents at a meeting on October 5, 1956, that the board “would do everything in its power to minimize simultaneous traffic between white and colored students in route to and from school.”
“Bill Clinton has sparked fury after allegedly saying of Barack Obama: “A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.”
The ex-president made the outrageous comment during Obama’s Democratic primary race with Clinton’s wife Hillary, a new book claims.
It allegedly came in a phone call with the late Teddy Kennedy, who was said to be “deeply offended”.
Clinton was unavailable for comment yesterday over the claim in a book about the presidential election called Game Change.
Writers John Heliemann and Mark Halperin say Clinton made the call “belittling Obama” the day after he won a key primary in Iowa.
Kennedy was said to be “fuming” as he later related Clinton’s words to a friend.
The book also claims Mrs Clinton – now in Obama’s Cabinet as Secretary of State – was keen to seize on claims of her rival’s alleged past drug use to win votes.”
On the theme of the racist Democrats hijacking MLK’s I have a dream speech: (btw: MLK was a Republican and a Christian, if he was alive today, the Dems would have loathed and trashed him like they do with black conservatives such as Justice Clarence Thomas, Allen West and Dr Carson, etc.)
Harry Reid on Obama”
“..a “light-skinned” African American “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one,” as he said privately..” Obsessed with his skin color much, ole Harry, and what is wrong with a “Negro dialect”, you racist Democrat!
Not to be out-done, Joe Biden about Obama:
“…first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy” First? You racist, Joe Biden!! So the others are not articulate, bright, clean and nice-looking? These Democrats are the real racists, they adored Robert Byrd, former KKK member.
Al Gore’s dad and Robert Byrd (Dem Senator West Virginia 1953 till 2010 and former KKK member) also voted agains the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Heck, the Dems filibustered the Civil Rights Act for 74 days!
“I believe that Democrats have lied about who supported the Civil Rights Act for so long that they actually believe their lies. But anytime this lie is retold, I feel compelled to debunk it. So here we go again…
The Congressional Quarterly of June 26, 1964 (p. 1323) recorded that, in the Senate, only 69% of Democrats (46 for, 21 against) voted for the Civil Rights Act as compared to 82% of Republicans (27 for, 6 against). All southern Democratic senators voted against the Act. This includes the current senator from West Virginia and former KKK member Robert C. Bryd and former Tennessee senator Al Gore, Sr. (the father of Bradley’s Democratic opponent). Surely young Bradley must have flunked his internship because ostensibly he did not learn that the Act’s primary opposition came from the southern Democrats’ 74-day filibuster.”
Um, MLK was NO Republican.
Stop making stuff up!!!!
“In a 2008 Associated Press story, King’s son and namesake Martin Luther King III said:”It is disingenuous to imply that my father was a Republican. He never endorsed any presidential candidate, and there is certainly no evidence that he ever even voted for a Republican. It is even more outrageous to suggest he would support the Republican Party of today, which has spent so much time and effort trying to suppress African American votes in Florida and many other states.”
His father was a registered Republican (MLK Snr), Black Republicans organized the march, etc. That is a fact. MLK Jr fought against both parties, like Sarah Palin.
(Btw, I cancelled my Republican membership after the last election – they have become Dem-lite.). I am now a conservative independent.
I have read various stories, some say MLK Jr was and some say he was not a Republican/Democrat, etc.
The stories about votes being suppressed are myths, the kind that Dem propagandists are very good at.
It is outrageous to suggest that MLK would support the Democrat Party today which hold up Margaret Sanger as an icon. The same Sanger who advocated for the control of the “negro population”. You do know that Planned Parenthood targets blacks for abortion, a former PP board member and others have testified about that.
It is also outrageous to suggest that MLK would support the Democrat Party today who embraced former KKK member, Robert Byrd and held him up as an icon, the same Byrd that led the 74 (57?) day filibuster against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The same Byrd that publicly called MLK a troublemaker, 6 days after that MLK was assinated.
Robert Byrd(Democrat Senator West Virginia 1953 till 2010 and former KKK member)
Just shut up. You are wrong and a fool.
Typical liberal response to the truth. It hurt ya, doesn’t it.
This is a personal blog. Most folks put pictures of their kids on their personal blogs.
Also, this is a blog about “faith and BEING A MOM”, of course you would post pics of your child! Explain that to a liberal lunatic.
This “melory4” person has got to be a political superstar we all know, whom I will not name out of respect for the little boy.