Will Atheists Find What They’re Looking for in Their Temples?

Will Atheists Find What They’re Looking for in Their Temples? March 15, 2013

Some common ground has been found for atheists and Christians. It’s called “awe.”

A recent Good.is article by Tom Greenall (an architect at DSDHA and studio tutor at the Royal College of Art) details how he and several colleagues teamed up with Alain De Botton, who was writing Religion for Atheists, to explore what atheists and secularists might learn from traditional theist practices. Together, they worked “to develop designs for a series of ‘temples to atheists,’ which would feature in his book.”

During their research and design for these secular temples, De Botton identified “that one of his primary concerns was with secular society’s need to be awed. This desire is something that we feel whether or not we subscribe to a faith.”

That’s true. There is a universal desire to experience awe through beauty. People seek it in religious expression and experience, the majesty of nature, grand man-made spaces, the arts, and so on. Believers already have dedicated spaces for religious-based awe, but atheists do not. De Botton and his team want to provide non-religious spaces (or “atheistic temples”) where atheists might go to encounter awe.

But will such spaces satisfy the desire? Professor and author C.S. Lewis didn’t think so. In his work The Weight of Glory, Lewis said that searching for awe apart from God will leave the seeker empty:

The books or the music in which we thought the beauty was located will betray us if we trust to them; it was not in them, it only came through them, and what came through them was longing. These things — the beauty, the memory of our own past — are good images 
of what we really desire; but if they are mistaken for the thing itself, they turn into dumb idols, breaking the hearts of their worshippers. For they are not the thing itself; they are only the scent of a flower we have not found, the echo of a tune we have not heard, news from a country we have never yet visited.

The things of this world — even the beautiful, awe-inspiring things — do not permanently satisfy the desire. We take in beauty in all its glory, experiencing great joy and pleasure. But these experiences only awaken and multiply the longing.

What we want from awe is transcendence, and no beauty on earth can promise us that. Awe is meant to lead us to the source that satisfies the root desire of our hearts. Christianity says the source is Jesus. Our awe-some encounters are meant to lead us to Him.

Will atheists find God in their secular temples? These magnificent places have the potential. Once the desire for transcendence is stirred, it just may lead them to look for more.

"Radford made a connection between Ender and Hitler.Another possible connection: Could Card have been referring ..."

‘Ender’s Game,’ Genocide, and Moral Culpability
"Faith is the confidence that what we hope for will actually happen; it gives us ..."

Music Matters: David Bowie, Still Not ..."
""that many of us do not accept that a few cells of human DNA constitute ..."

How I Changed My Mind About ..."
"No thought given to the unborn child whose life was 'silenced and oppressed'... sad."

How I Changed My Mind About ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • I’ve always thought John Galt’s powerhouse was an excellent description of an atheist temple.

    “The door of the structure was a straight, smooth sheet of stainless steel, softly lustrous and bluish in the sun. Above it, cut in the granite, as the only feature of the building’s rectangular austerity, there stood an inscription.

    ‘I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.'”

    No God. No people. No community. A shrine to human achievement and ingenuity, without any Other to hope for.

  • Ian

    I would like to point out that having a Christian speak for how atheists respond to beauty and awe is a good way to miss the mark entirely. Of course a Christian would see God behind beauty, just as others would see Allah behind it. Religions do not have a monopoly on beauty.

  • Joshua

    While humans can and have produced phenomenal works or art and architecture to “awe” the faithful laypeople, I believe merely duplicating a religious practice without the sincerity of actually believing in a higher power is a fruitless exercise.

    I speak as a Christian, so I can only imagine what an atheist would think. And I could be wrong; maybe atheists will find such temples enlightening. But if I were to imagine, I’d agree with C.S. Lewis; I just don’t see it.

    Temples, like most buildings, are more than their physical structure and beauty; they’re whatever we’ve made them in our minds. They’re places that many go to pray or sit silently, contemplating the mystery of God and the purpose of their lives. They’ve been treated as neutral territory, bastions of a city’s morality, or at least domains for temperate behavior.

    I feel that manufacturing temples for the sole purpose of beauty and “awe” is too superficial to work. For atheist temples to have meaning, humans *must* ascribe meaning to it. But I doubt one will find fulfillment or solace in the captivating beauty of a temple if, in the back of their minds, there’s no God or mystery behind it all; it’s still *just* a temple.