Do such remarks say more about the critic than about the Church?

Do such remarks say more about the critic than about the Church? May 29, 2018


The first temple in Paris
Yet another view of the Paris France Temple (


I frequently read online comments, especially from former believers, claiming that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is a corporation that cares only for its own interests and doesn’t care about the needs of its members.


I must admit that I find such remarks baffling.  Weird, even.


It’s true, of course, that believing Latter-day Saints (presumably including their leaders) regard the Church as the Kingdom of God on the earth, and that they feel a powerful obligation to consecrate their time and effort and resources to building it and strengthening it.  I certainly do.


But an essential part of building and strengthening the Kingdom is caring for the needs of its members.


I was — no false modesty here; I’m quite serious — a mediocre bishop.  But even I, not naturally the most caring and empathetic of men, devoted many hours each week to counseling, one-on-one, with young people who were struggling with their social lives (or lack thereof), with various kinds of addiction, with burdensome guilt, with dysfunctional or absent families.  I helped members prepare for missions and marriages.  I encouraged large responses to blood drives.  I performed a few weddings.  I dealt with unwed pregnancies.  I accompanied sick and injured people to hospitals, often in the middle of the night.  I dealt with police situations.  I sent people with mental and emotional problems to professional counselors, if they wanted that, and I picked up their bills with Church funds.  I paid rent for those who would otherwise be homeless.  I bought food for those who would otherwise not eat.


And I was just one of thousands of such unpaid bishops, who were and are doing similar things at any moment of any given day, worldwide.


Moreover, I loved doing it.  I found it exhausting, but profoundly gratifying.


To which some will respond, “Yeah, but you were just one of the exploited underlings.  The Church, as such, doesn’t care about its members.”


To which I respond, “Who or what is this ‘Church’ you speak of, if it’s not precisely such people as I was (and, I hope, still am)?”


Take away its members, and there is no “Church” left over.


Moreover, the very highest leadership of the Church doesn’t come from any sort of distinct professional caste.  Just a few years ago, they too were bishops and stake presidents, and elders quorum presidents and deacons quorum advisors and home teachers, helping to load moving vans and serving at ward breakfasts and accompanying Scout camps and caring for families and counseling with members, one on one.  And they still do quite a bit of the latter, even now.


I happen to know many of these highest leaders, some more familiarly than others.  If they’re not honest, committed, and sincere men, dedicated to both the Church and the Saints, I’m a leprechaun.


I’m reminded of a remark from Heber J. Grant:


“I had a letter when I, as a young man, was made an apostle, from a nonmember of the Church. . . .  Of prominence in the world so far as business affairs are concerned, he was the manager of a great corporation.. . .  He said: ‘I never thought very much of the leaders of the Mormon people, in fact I thought they were a very bright, keen, designing lot of fellows, getting rich from the tithes that they gathered in from a lot of ignorant, superstitious, and over-zealous religious people. But now that you are one of the fifteen men at the head of the Mormon Church, I apologize to the other fourteen. I know that if there were anything crooked in the management of the Mormon Church you would give it all away.’”


Posted from Paris, France




Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment