A comment on the Iranian missile strikes

A comment on the Iranian missile strikes January 8, 2020


At Persepolis
The ruins of ancient Persepolis, in Iran — the ceremonial capital of the Achaemenid Empire between about BC 550 and BC 330 — is one of the most impressive archaeological sites I’ve ever visited.

(Wikimedia Commons public domain photograph)


I liked this piece on the CNN website, and I suspect that its analysis might be correct :


“Iran’s strikes seem intended to avoid US deaths. Here’s why that might be the case”


Iran had to respond in some way or other to the killing of one of its most prominent generals, and I hope that the overnight missile strike was enough and that it was deliberately symbolic rather than effective.


I’ve mentioned here the time that I once spent talking with Iran’s current foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif:


“My encounter with Iran’s foreign minister”


I liked him, and I like the article’s suggestion that his moderation may — may — have won out in this matter.  I hope, if the analysis proves to be correct, that President Trump will respond accordingly.


But I worry that he may not.  We’re all aware of his enthusiasm for counterpunches, after all.  And I think that Jonah Goldberg, one of my favorite conservative commentators, is exactly and unfortunately right in this article:


“As with Everything Else, Trump Is Following His Gut on Iran: Consistency is in the eye of the beholder, not the man.”




I’ve shed no tears over the dispatch of Qassem Soleimani to the nether realms.  He was a terrible man.  I won’t miss him.  But I’m hoping that we don’t get into a serious hot war with Iran.  We would, of course, win it.  But at considerable cost, and to the considerable satisfaction of powers such as Russia and China, who do not wish us well and who would only stand to gain from a war between the Islamic Republic and the United States.


And I certainly hope that President Trump won’t carry through with his threat to destroy Persian cultural treasures:


“Trump’s threat to commit war crimes by bombing Iran’s cultural sites, explained: His nakedly illegal threat serves to expose the brutal essence of Trump’s Iran war.”


Not only would it arguably be a war crime, it would serve the very undesirable purpose of uniting virtually all Iranians behind the current regime and against the United States.  Iranians are justifiably very proud of their rich history and culture, and they can (in my experience) be fiercely patriotic even if they despise their government.  To go after non-military and non-political targets would be the very apex of stupidity and would poison the image of the United States even more than it’s already been poisoned in the region.



"The article about "mommy bloggers" is interesting, though I wonder if they are only referring ..."

“The Evangelical Church is Breaking Apart”
"We are a church, and I consider it inevitable that the same forces that have ..."

“The Evangelical Church is Breaking Apart”
"I can understand people leaving the Church. What disgusts me is when people get "cutesy" ..."

“That You May Come Off Conqueror”
"There are a great many leftist culture warriors and there have been for a long ..."

“The Evangelical Church is Breaking Apart”

Browse Our Archives