“It is no more heretical to say the Universe displays purpose, as [Sir Fred] Hoyle has done, than to say that it is pointless, as Steven Weinberg has done. Both statements are metaphysical and outside science. Yet it seems that scientists are permitted by their own colleagues to say metaphysical things about lack of purpose and not the reverse. This suggests to me that science, in allowing this metaphysical notion, sees itself as religion and presumably as an atheistic religion (if you can have such a thing).’
Michael Shallis, “In the eye of a storm,” New Scientist, 101 (1393): 42–43 (19 January 1984)
Posted from Venice, Italy
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In