In their online conversation about Book of Mormon historicity, Professor Phillip Jenkins has repeatedly demanded “evidence” from Professor William Hamblin, while Professor Hamblin has sought to first establish some methodological parameters for evaluating such evidence and what it means — plainly because he regards Professor Jenkins’s position as profoundly flawed, methodologically speaking. (Which, for the record, I also do.) Here, in a very interesting blog entry, Neal Rappleye looks at a closely parallel issue connected with the... Read more