There are two broad ways of viewing the Book of Mormon: One holds it to be bogus and proposes some kind of naturalistic explanation for its existence. The other accepts it to be what it claims to be and, thus, necessarily entails what can rather crudely be termed a “supernatural” explanation for it. There are, in my judgment, good arguments against the first alternative and for the second. (If I didn’t think so, I wouldn’t be a... Read more