Biblically speaking, the ideal form of government is a benevolent monarchy. But until Christ returns and establishes such, we will have to do with the human governments with which we have.
We do so, while at the same time recognizing that no form of human governing is perfect. All are subject to the abuse of power and the oppression of the powerless.
Ideally, a democratic system provides the opportunity to overcome oppression by giving a voice and a vote equally to the marginalized and the oppressed. Of course, for this to work 50.1% of the people must actually vote in accord with justice for all.
When a people group is systemically oppressed the only way to overcome that oppression is for those in power to implement change.
On the flip side: one of the ways to maintain the oppression of a people group is to deny them access to power. In a democracy, this begins by denying them the right to vote.
In a democratic system, one of the weapons of those in power is voter disenfranchisement. By not permitting those who are suffering injustice the ability to vote and elect persons to advocate for them, the system presents a barrier to overcoming injustice.
Voter disenfranchisement is a powerful means of maintaining systemic oppression.
The right to vote in the US
Voter disenfranchisement has a long history in the American political landscape. For nearly a century after its beginning, America was a democratic society for White men only.
It was not until 1920 that White women received the right to vote. The ardent efforts of White men to deny that right to women illustrates my point that for a democracy to work well those in power must implement change. Though we may look back and sing the praises of the democratic system that gave White women the right to vote, those living at the time knew that it did not come easy!
Black men were technically allowed to vote with the ratification of the 15th amendment in 1870. The problem was that though Black men were constitutionally permitted to vote, they were routinely denied that right throughout much of the US for many decades to come.
All sorts of measures were enacted to deny Blacks the right to vote. Jemar Tisby notes,
The poll tax charged people money to vote, money that Black people and even some poor Whites did not have. They also enacted the “grandfather clause,” which permitted only people who could vote prior to 1867 and their descendants to vote. Of course, this excluded most Black people. White voter registration officials also used “literacy tests” wherein potential voters had to read a portion of the state or national Constitution. Similarly, “understanding tests” asked Black voters to answer obscure questions related to the Constitution. White “redeemers” selectively administered these tests to bar Black voters from the democratic process.
Voter suppression is not simply a thing of the past
Unfortunately, efforts to keep persons of color and even poor Whites from voting remain alive and well in the US. An article in the Atlantic notes, “voter suppression is commonplace and . . . voting is routinely harder for people of color than for their White counterparts.”
The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU reports that between Jan 1, 2021 and July 14, 2021, “at least 18 states enacted 30 laws that restrict access to the vote. These laws make mail voting and early voting more difficult, impose harsher voter ID requirements, and make faulty voter purges more likely, among other things. More than 400 bills with provisions that restrict voting access have been introduced in 49 states in the 2021 legislative sessions.”
Some states and counties continue to administer literacy tests, impose poll taxes, and even require in-person voting—something the elderly, the disabled, and the poor are not able to accomplish very easily.
Another ploy is to reduce the number of polling places, which hinders the poor who are less able to travel to more distant locations and/or be away for longer times. Polling places in numerous states have been severely limited in areas of color.
Last September, I personally came across an article on how a county in Texas endeavored to send a letter to everyone in their county informing them on whether they could vote by mail and how to do so.
(Voting by mail is often necessary for the poor, the elderly, and the handicapped. And in the year 2020 it was important to help curb the spread of the Corona Virus)
The piece noted, however, that the Attorney General of Texas sued the county in an effort to stop the mailer. The Attorney General’s argument amounted to, “if we tell them their rights it will only lead to confusion and voter fraud.” How, of course, the AG failed to mention. The court struck down the motion, though the last I saw it was still lingering in appeals courts.
Several states have passed laws prohibiting those who have committed a felony the right to vote. I know many Whites who do not see a problem with this: “They committed a felony; therefore, they should lose the right to vote”—so goes the argument.
One of the problems with this line of reasoning is that the logic makes no sense. What does committing a felony have to do with the right to representation? Does a person suddenly become a non-person because they have committed a heinous crime? A person does not cease being made in the image of God the moment they commit a crime.
In addition, since, as I noted in a previous post, the criminal justice system disproportionately incarcerates people of color, such laws serve as another means of disenfranchising people of color from voting.
Furthermore, some of the disenfranchised have been convicted of felony possession of marijuana—a drug that is now legal in several states. This means that some Americans are denied the right to vote because they merely possessed something that may be legally purchased in more than 10 states.
Voter suppression has the potential to seriously undermine a democratic society, especially one that has a history of significant racial inequalities.
What does this mean?
One of the arguments that I have been presuming throughout this series of posts is that if some of those in power are racially prejudiced, then we should not be surprised when those in power continue to make efforts to ensure that people of color remain oppressed.
To deny systemic racism today can only be done by denying America’s racist past and that some of those in power are still clinging to that past
Voter suppression is as serious an issue as there is for a democratic society. In fact, I would contend that there may not be an issue as significant as voter suppression and as indicative of the presence of systemic racism.
It is not un-American to point out our racially prejudiced history or to affirm that this history still affects the present. It is, however, un-Christian to not cry out against injustice.
If you have been blessed by this blog post and would like to see others benefit too, would you please consider giving a tax-deductible contribution to support determinetruth ministries and make possible future posts like this? You may give a tax-deductible gift by following this link
Good news: If you wish to view this blog on your smartphone through the Determinetruth app simply download the “tithe.ly church” app on your smartphone and insert “determinetruth” as the church name you wish to follow. Once it is loaded, simply click on the “blog” icon and they will automatically load.
If you would like to have Rob speak at your church or organization in person or via zoom, please let us know by filling out the contact info on the Contact me tab on this site.
If you would like to share your story, or if you have questions that you would like addressed in future posts, you may submit them in the Contact me tab on this site.
 Technically American is a democratic republic.
 Though I am always cautious about any “majority” wins approach.
 For more information on voter disenfranchisement see: https://www.adl.org/what-we-do/discrimination/voting-rights. Last accessed 9-25-20.
 Francis Butler Simkins, “Ben Tillman’s View of the Negro,” The Journal of Southern History
 Tisby, Jemar. The Color of Compromise (p. 97). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.
 Vann Newkirk II, The Atlantic, “Voter Suppression is Warping Democracy,” July 17, 2018: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/07/poll-prri-voter-suppression/565355/. Last accessed 9-22-20.
 https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-july-2021. Last accessed 11-15-21. Emphasis original.
 https://www.texastribune.org/2020/09/02/Harris-County-absentee-ballott/. last accessed 9-22-20.
 Some states deny them the right while incarcerated and other states deny them the right for life.