Is Indiana Jones IV a go, now? Whatever.

Is Indiana Jones IV a go, now? Whatever. December 30, 2006

Apparently while I was out with the wife and kids last night, checking out the Bright Nights display at Stanley Park, the blogosphere exploded with the news that George Lucas declared yesterday — without giving away any story details, natch — that Indiana Jones IV will begin shooting next year, for release in 2008.

Whatever. Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) is a classic for all time, of course, but neither of the sequels produced so far is anything to write home about — so why would this one be any different?

Still, if this new film does get made, it will be intriguing to see how it turns out, since Lucas and Spielberg have gone down very different artistic paths over the past two decades.

Indeed, they had already begun going down those paths at some point between the second and third Indiana Jones films, which came out in 1984 and 1989, respectively. During that period, Lucas produced Howard the Duck (1986), Labyrinth (1986) and Willow (1988), plus a couple of Ewok TV-movies (1984-1985) — all of which apparently ranged from awful to mediocre — whereas Spielberg had begun to get serious with The Color Purple (1985), which was a hit, and Empire of the Sun (1987), which was not.

Since then, their career paths have diverged even more. Lucas has essentially ruined his reputation as a film-maker for all time, by tampering with the original Star Wars and producing all three prequels. And Spielberg? He has delved into the more troubling aspects of American and European history, won two Oscars, and collaborated posthumously with Stanley Kubrick; even his “popcorn” movies, like Minority Report (2002; my review) and War of the Worlds (2005), aren’t all that escapist any more.

Both men “needed” the third film, to affirm their viability at the box office or to affirm their credibility as entertainers. But do either of them “need” a fourth film? Doubtful. The only person who really “needs” this movie now is Harrison Ford, who hasn’t had anything resembling a hit — critically or commercially — in years. Perhaps Lucas and Spielberg are doing this as a favour for him.

But let’s not analyze this movie too much before it actually gets made — assuming, that is, that it does get made, in the end.

"Having researched this from top to bottom and front to back, the charges are absolute ..."

A few thoughts on the whole ..."
"We are so happy we have reached you through here and you came to know ..."

Watch: The Savior, possibly the first ..."
"I had not known about this movie except for here. Thanks for posting the English ..."

Watch: The Savior, possibly the first ..."
"The science in Dark City was just plain flaky.As opposed to the oh-so-realistic "human metabolism ..."

Dark City and the ambiguous ending.

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • I rather loved the third Indiana Jones (possibly even more than the first one), but I found the second one to be simply passable entertainment. I’m hoping Speilberg is more involved with this new version than Lucas, and that they find a way to bring Connery back. The early rumours that Natalie Portman would play Indy’s daughter would be remarkable if they were true (I just love her), but frankly I’d take any kind of decent film in the adventure genre.

  • Ford’s lookin’ rough.