The case against the Olympics

The case against the Olympics

The Winter Olympics begin February 7 in Sochi, Russia, and people are getting nervous over terrorism threats, anti-gay laws, the toilet situation, and whatever Vladimir Putin might do.

Columnist Charles Lane argues that the Olympics have gotten too politicized, too expensive, too drug-saturated, too corrupt, and too corporate.  We should just end them.  Read his case against the Olympics here.

Does he have a point?  Or is there still value in having virtually all of the countries of the world come together in a huge athletic event?  Might the Olympics be reformed rather than killed?

"The three Roman Catholic countries in the top five flourishing countries have a new Pope ..."

Surprises from a Huge Study on ..."
"reg complains that criteria are too subjective, but I think that if it weren't, it ..."

Surprises from a Huge Study on ..."
"A few quibbles and notes:1. I would put Israel in the WEIRD category. 2. Same ..."

Surprises from a Huge Study on ..."
"The criteria seem way too subjective and vague/squishy for me to place much weight or ..."

Surprises from a Huge Study on ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!