Van Halen and the brown M&M’s

Van Halen and the brown M&M’s

Ezra Klein gives the rest of the story about that anecdote about rock stars’ wretched excess, in the process formulating what he calls the “Van Halen Principle”:

Right there on Page 40, in the “Munchies” section, nestled between “pretzels” and “twelve (12) Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups,” is a parenthetical alert so adamant you can’t miss it: “M&M’s,” the text reads, “(WARNING: ABSOLUTELY NO BROWN ONES).”

This is the famed rider to Van Halen’s 1982 concert contract. In a sentence fragment that would define rock-star excess forevermore, the band demanded a bowl of M&M’s with the brown ones laboriously excluded. It was such a ridiculous, over- the-top demand, such an extreme example of superstar narcissism, that the contract passed almost instantly into rock lore.

It also wasn’t true.

I don’t mean that the M&M language didn’t appear in the contract, which really did call for a bowl of M&M’s — “NO BROWN ONES.” But the color of the candy was entirely beside the point.

“Van Halen was the first to take 850 par lamp lights — huge lights — around the country,” explained singer David Lee Roth. “At the time, it was the biggest production ever.” Many venues weren’t ready for this. Worse, they didn’t read the contract explaining how to manage it. The band’s trucks would roll up to the concert site, and the delays, mistakes and costs would begin piling up.

So Van Halen established the M&M test. “If I came backstage and I saw brown M&M’s on the catering table, it guaranteed the promoter had not read the contract rider, and we had to do a serious line check,” Roth explained.

Call it the Van Halen Principle: Tales of someone doing something unbelievably stupid or selfish or irrational are often just stories you don’t yet understand. It’s a principle that often applies to Washington.

via How Van Halen explains Obamacare, salmon regulation and scientific grants.

Mr. Klein goes on to apply the Van Halen principle to seemingly ridiculous stories about Washington bureaucracy.

Though the principle may be valid, I still think Van Halen’s demand is wretched excess.  If it was just a test of whether the venue read the contract, why couldn’t the band just count the number of Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups?  And why would the caterers have anything to do with how to handle the lighting?

"Of course, the most serious existential crisis is one where you question whether you actually ..."

A Third of Americans Are Having ..."
""The one-third of Americans and the one-half of young Americans who are struggling with an ..."

A Third of Americans Are Having ..."
"I wouldn't use the word "settled." I'd prefer the term "consensual." The former suggests some ..."

There Is No Scientific Consensus in ..."
"Yes. Also, significantly, that it takes a (empirically superior) paradigm to kill a prevailing paradigm. ..."

There Is No Scientific Consensus in ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

An entire city of 120,000 people repented, yet I was angry when God relented from judgment. Why was I displeased?

Select your answer to see how you score.