The case against the Olympics

The case against the Olympics

The Winter Olympics begin February 7 in Sochi, Russia, and people are getting nervous over terrorism threats, anti-gay laws, the toilet situation, and whatever Vladimir Putin might do.

Columnist Charles Lane argues that the Olympics have gotten too politicized, too expensive, too drug-saturated, too corrupt, and too corporate.  We should just end them.  Read his case against the Olympics here.

Does he have a point?  Or is there still value in having virtually all of the countries of the world come together in a huge athletic event?  Might the Olympics be reformed rather than killed?

"Short answer: No.Slightly longer answer: I do not trust the current administration to plan, prepare ..."

DISCUSS: Should We Attack Iran?
"The three Roman Catholic countries in the top five flourishing countries have a new Pope ..."

Surprises from a Huge Study on ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!