Verdict

Verdict

In response to all of the discussion about “to ban or not to ban,” I think I will take the suggestion by Webmonk and others to delete certain comments that I find repetitive, tangential, or obnoxious.

I will be constrained by time, how busy I am, and when I get around to reading the comments. But I will try to supervise the discussions a little more. Hopefully, I can avoid banning people, though if I find myself always striking their comments that could happen. But I hope to keep this a positive forum in accord with its past reputation.

I do want this to remain a place where Lutherans and non-Lutherans, conservatives and liberals, Christians and non-Christians, can come together to discuss and interact. That can’t happen if any of the sides are vicious and insulting to each other. So all of us would do well to mind our manners. Again, I prize vigorous debate, but gratuitous rudeness will get your comment smitten (even if I do agree with it). A good test: Would you say this to a person’s face, without the anonymity of the internet? If not, rephrase.

"Mathematical constructions are not subject to the same kinds of limitations as physical objects."

OpenAI’s Proposed “Industrial Policy”
"Not communism. Statist, corporatist fascism as SKP suggests is the underlying model described."

OpenAI’s Proposed “Industrial Policy”
"Isn't Murphy's Law proof that zero vulnerabilities is a mirage."

OpenAI’s Proposed “Industrial Policy”
"Sounds like a new version of the PPP loan program-and the nice thing about that ..."

OpenAI’s Proposed “Industrial Policy”

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Pentecost" mean in Greek?

Select your answer to see how you score.