Publicizing torture

Publicizing torture

Yes, “enhanced interrogation methods” is an Orwellian euphemism for torture. The Bush administration allowed it, though drawing the line at techniques that caused serious physical injury or death. The Obama administration draws the line at harming prisoners at all. But what possible good will it do to release to the public all the details and more Abu Ghraib-like photographs? Lawbreakers can be punished, but what is the purpose of the publicity? Is more demonization of George Bush worth the damage to our military, the CIA, and our country’s reputation?

[Reference: Will pursuing torture truth derail Obama’s agenda?]

"But the 50s wasn't all doowop, or even mostly doowop. Maybe you are thinking of ..."

DISCUSS: What Do You Miss?
"Currently out of stock, but you can sign up to be notified when it's available. ..."

DISCUSS: What Do You Miss?
"Tom Hering found it. Apparently it hasn't been made in ages. The drugstore I mentioned ..."

DISCUSS: What Do You Miss?
"I happened to come across a deeper analysis of the nature of morality contained in ..."

Treating Feelings as the Source of ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!