Paying for sex makes it not adultery?

Paying for sex makes it not adultery? June 18, 2015

A Japanese court, ruling against a wronged wife, has ruled that if a husband pays for sex with a woman he is not married to, that is a business transaction and so cannot be considered adultery.

From Extramarital sex involving payment not adultery, Tokyo court says – UPI.com:

Sexual relationships that involve the exchange of money cannot be considered adultery, according to a Tokyo District Court ruling involving a couple and a bar hostess.

The verdict finalized in 2014 is stirring controversy among Japan’s legal experts, The Japan Times reported Wednesday. No damages were rewarded to the plaintiff – the wife of a man who was allegedly sleeping with a hostess for more than seven years.

Japanese newspaper Asahi Shimbun reported the sexual relationship between the man, a company president, and the paid sex partner had caused the plaintiff “emotional distress,” and that she had sought more than $32,000 in compensation.

Judge Masamitsu Shiseki of the Tokyo District Court ruled in 2014 the sex between the plaintiff’s husband and the hostess was strictly business, and therefore did not harm the marriage.

“The defendant had sexual relations with her patron only for business, like in cases of prostitution, and such conduct does not damage peaceful marital life,” Shiseki had said.

 

"That is what I had in mind. The RCC have all manner of "deifying" names ..."

God in the Womb
"I think it is a good idea both as an outreach strategy and for a ..."

DISCUSSION: Church Services that Only Last ..."
"The prospect of God in Mary's womb may "tell us much" in a theological sense, ..."

God in the Womb
"What you say is true in the context of the rest of Roman Catholic soteriology, ..."

God in the Womb

Browse Our Archives