June 24, 2019

The Peace Cross in Bladensburg, Maryland, is a 40-foot cross erected by local residents and the American Legion as a memorial to Americans who died in World War I.  Today it stands on a highway median owned by a state commission.  The American Humanist Association filed a lawsuit arguing that the cross’s placement on public land amounts to an unconstitutional establishment of religion.  A lower court agreed, suggesting that the monument either be moved or its cross arms cut off (!), so that it would be shaped like an obelisk rather than a Christian cross.  (Why wouldn’t that be establishing the religion of ancient Egypt?)  But the Supreme Court ruled that the cross can stay.

The vote was 7-2, so this decision cannot be attributed, as it surely will be, to the Trump-engineered conservative court.  Liberal justices joined in the decision, with only Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissenting.

Does this ruling in  American Legion v. American Humanist Association mean an end to the lawsuits that seek to exclude religious imagery from the public square?  Not necessarily, but it does add some interesting dimensions to how the law will consider such cases.

Currently, courts have followed the “Lemon test,” derived from the 1971 Supreme Court decision in the case Lemon v. Kurtzman,which prevented Pennsylvania from paying part of the salary of teachers in Catholic Schools.  According to that decision, any legislation regarding religion must (1) have a secular purpose; (2) neither advance nor inhibit religion; and (3) avoid “excessive government entanglement” with religion.

Though the new justice Neal Gorsuch urged in a concurring opinion that the Lemon test be scrapped as being too vague, the ruling in the Bladensburg Cross case left the Lemon test standing, but applied it in some new ways.

One argument put forward by some defenders of the Peace Cross is that it has a purely secular meaning.  But the attempt to “secularize” the Cross is problematic from a Christian point of view.  How can a cross symbolize sacrifice unless it refers to Christ’s sacrifice?  This decision, though, declined to secularize the cross.

Justice Samuel Alito, who wrote the decision, put it this way:

The fact that the cross is undoubtedly a Christian symbol should not blind one to everything else that the Bladensburg Cross has come to represent: a symbolic resting place for ancestors who never returned home, a place for the community to gather and honor all veterans and their sacrifices for this Nation, and a historical landmark.

So a symbol is recognized as being capable of multiple meanings.  This strikes me as an important insight.  A church depicted on a small town logo might indeed symbolize Christianity, but it can also be used to symbolize the town’s historical founding by a religious community.

Justice Alito also made the point that getting rid of the Cross at Bladensberg itself would constitute a religious statement, one that violates the principle of government neutrality towards religions:

“For many, destroying or defacing the Cross would not be neutral and would not further the ideals of respect and tolerance embodied in the First Amendment.”

This is in line with other recent Supreme Court decisions that emphasize that religion has a protected status under the Constitution and that the government may not express opposition to its citizens’ religions.  Because the Cross is a sacred symbol, not just a secular one, to deface it–as in sawing off the cross beams to turn it into an obelisk–is religiously offensive.  And getting rid of all crosses on public land–such as other war memorials and the headstones in military cemeteries–would carry anti-Christian overtones.

However, Alito also wrote that “retaining established, religiously expressive monuments, symbols, and practices is quite different from erecting or adopting new ones. The passage of time gives rise to a strong presumption of constitutionality.”  So new monuments would be expected to be in accord with current views of inclusivity.  A war memorial to those who died in the Iraq War, for instance, would be expected to include references to the Jews and Muslims, as well as Christians, who died.  This part of the decision shows a recognition of history, suggesting that monuments from the past cannot be expected to measure up to modern standards, though new monuments should.

It will surely take more litigation to sort out all of these issues fully.  But I suspect that the Bladensburg Cross case will be a significant milestone.

 

Photo:  Bladensburg Peace Cross by Ken Firestone, Creative Commons License 2.0.

May 20, 2024

Canada’s “blood libel against Christians”; the world’s baby shortage; and the Taylor Swift liturgy.

Canada’s “Blood Libel against Christians”

Remember those Catholic boarding schools for Indian children in Canada where mass graves were discovered, leading to charges that the Catholic church was complicit in genocide?

Well, turns out, it didn’t happen.  John Daniel Davidson of the Federalist tells the tale, well summed up in the headline and the deck: The Discovery Of ‘Mass Graves’ Of Indigenous Canadian Children Was Actually A Massive Hoax:  “Three years after reports of indigenous mass graves triggered the torching or vandalism of 85-plus churches, no graves have been found.”

In 2021 the Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc First Nation tribe announced that ground-penetrating radar discovered the remains near the Kamloops Indian Residential School in British Columbia, a government-funded institution run by the Catholic Church from the 1860s to the 1990s.  These schools, which were common not only in Canada but in the United States, had already become controversial.  They were attempts to integrate the native tribes into the rest of America by acculturating them into the white man’s ways.  This required separating the children from their families.

(Boarding schools are pretty much the opposite of home schools.  But they have a long pedigree and are still prominent in the lives of the British aristocracy and wealthy Americans.  In the LCMS, the six-year secondary institutions that were classical “gymnasia” were boarding schools and became part of the “Concordia” system.  One of them, with the extra two years trimmed off, is still operating: St. Paul Lutheran High School in Concordia, Missouri.)

I’m not defending these tribal schools, which seem to me to violate the estate of the family, and though they may have been well-intentioned on one level, they certainly were meant to undo tribal cultures and taking children away from their parents was cruel and traumatic all round.  But the accounts of mass graves created the impression that churches were engaged in out and out genocide, killing the children in large numbers and dumping their bodies in pits as in the concentration camps, with no respect for their mortal remains.

What the ground radar apparently found was a cemetery, whose wooden crosses had decayed but whose individual graves, which included those of the priests and nuns who had lived there for over a century, were hallowed.  That news, though, hasn’t gotten out.  Even though the original unconfirmed story was hyped as if it were true by the media, unleashing anti-Catholic and anti-Christian outrage in Canada and elsewhere, resulting in 85 churches–not all of them Catholic and some of them native–being burned, vandalized, or desecrated.

Davidson goes into detail about the way the story was covered and the rage it provoked.  For example, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau demanded that the Pope come to Canada to apologize, which he did.  In response to the church arsons, Trudeau said that he understood why people would set them on fire.  The director of the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association responded to  those attacks with the tweet, “Burn it all down.”

The accusations are still circulating–they loom behind a Longmire mystery I read recently–and Davidson calls them “a modern-day blood libel against Christians.”  That term “blood libel”  properly refers to the antisemitic lies about Jews shedding Gentile blood, but the way the word “genocide” is being thrown around, a term coined to describe what the Nazis did to the Jews, who–in another blood libel–are now being accused of committing it themselves, I’ll let it stand as another example of anti-religious hysteria.

The World’s Baby Shortage

We have known that the fertility rate–the average number of children that a woman in a given population has–has been in decline in the developed world.  But new data has found that the fertility rate is plummeting worldwide, among nearly all cultures, income levels, and economies.  For the first time in human history, the world’s population will soon be declining.

A population’s replacement rate is, obviously, 2, actually 2.2 to account for deaths.  Despite a brief post-COVID uptick, the fertility rate in the United States is 1.62.  In some developed nations, it is even lower.  It was assumed that the birth rates in the less developed countries of Africa and Asia would make up for this decline.  But, to the surprise of the experts, fewer babies are being born there, as well.  Soon, probably this year, the world’s fertility rate will slip to 2.1, below replacement rate.  Projections are for the world’s population to peak at 9.5 billion, then start declining by 2061.

Those of us who were taught to be afraid of a population explosion might wonder, why is that a bad thing?  With smaller populations, won’t that mean fewer people to take care of and more food and other resources to go around? No.  Small populations mean a smaller economic market–fewer people to buy things and fewer people to produce them–plus a growing proportion of old people with fewer young folks to support them, among other demographic problems.

Greg Ip and Janet Adamy have written about this global population decline for the Wall Street Journal in a story entitled Suddenly There Aren’t Enough Babies. The Whole World Is Alarmed. with the deck “Birthrates are falling fast across countries, ​with economic, social and geopolitical ​consequences.”  (The original article is behind a paywall, but you can find it for free here.)

They say of the impending population implosions,

​Many government leaders see this as a matter of national urgency. They worry about shrinking workforces, slowing economic growth and underfunded pensions; and the vitality of a society with ever-fewer children. Smaller populations come with diminished global clout, raising questions in the U.S., China and Russia about their long-term standings as superpowers.

Many governments have been trying to address the problem by creating financial incentives to have children, but these have been largely ineffective.  And no one knows just why this is happening:

In research published in 2021, the University of Maryland’s Kearney and two co-authors looked for possible explanations for the continued drop [in the United States]. They found that state-level differences in parental abortion notification laws, unemployment, Medicaid availability, housing costs, contraceptive usage, religiosity, child-care costs and student debt could explain almost none of the decline. “We suspect that this shift reflects broad societal changes that are hard to measure or quantify,” they conclude.

But this is happening in more traditional cultures as well.  India has surpassed China–whose “one child” policy of forced abortion has proven disastrous–as the world’s most populous nation.  But, according to Ip and Adamy, “Fertility is below replacement in India even though the country is still poor and many women don’t work—factors that usually sustain fertility.”  The same is true of sub-Saharan Africa.

My explanation is Luke 23:29.

The Taylor Swift Liturgy

Practitioners of contemporary worship have been putting Christian lyrics to the tunes of pop music.  A church in Germany has taken the next step:  go ahead and use the pop lyrics as well.   Just borrow the hit songs from a pop star.

The 600-year-old Church of the Holy Spirit in Heidelberg held a “Taylor Swift Church Service.”  As reported by a German newspaper,

“The Church of the Holy Spirit has always been a place of encounter and exchange. That’s why a pop-music religious service fits so perfectly,” said Heidelberg Pastor Christof Ellsiepen. “With it, we are giving space to the questions and issues that occupy the younger generation.”

And the service did bring in the crowds, which totaled some 1,200 people for the two services.  A band played the music and a singer–not Swift herself, of course–performed the songs.  As for the sermon,

Parish Pastor Vincenzo Petracca quoted numerous lyrics and traced Swift’s biography, emphasizing her attachment to and understanding of Christianity in everyday life.

Petracca acknowledged that Swift’s songs are open to numerous interpretations but highlighted the strong Christian — and political — messages she integrates into her songs, which address the subjects of women’s rightsracism and gender equality, among others. . . .

Swift herself has chastised “hypocritical faith” that puts dogma before people. The pastor emphasized as well, that, “her faith knows doubt and inner-conflict.”

“Theologically speaking, she points to the justness of God,” says Petracca, adding, “For her, faith and action are inseparable.”

The Church of the Holy Spirit has a long and storied history.  Built from 1340-1515, it was, of course, a Catholic church.  It went Lutheran for awhile–the University of Heidelberg was where Luther held his Disputation that formulated his “theology of the cross”–but then it went Reformed when the Electors of the Palatinate became Calvinists.  The church was instrumental in the issuing of the Heidelberg Catechism used by many Reformed Christians today.  Later, some rulers of the principality were Catholic.  The church has changed denominations ten times.  Off and on for 300 years, the church had a wall separating the nave and the chancel so that there could be two different altars, allowing Catholics and Protestants to worship in the same building at the same time.  More recently in the 1970s, the church installed stained glass windows that replaced the traditional Biblical themes with imagery representing modern science.  The sanctuary includes a rainbow banner welcoming “all sizes, all [colors], all cultures, all sexes, all beliefs, all religions, all ages, all types, all people.” Today the Church of the Holy Spirit belongs to the unionistic Protestant Church in Germany.

I am surprised that such an inclusive church–with its ecumenical heritage of bringing together Catholics, Lutherans, and the Reformed–would turn to the rather more forthright Taylor Swift, whose mindset is “We are never, ever, ever getting back together.”

 

 

November 5, 2015

Hillary Clinton and her organization are fending off the threat from the left by accusing Bernie Sanders–avowed socialist with impeccable leftist credentials–of sexism and racism!  This is because of these two statements he made during the debate:

In the debate, Sanders began by saying, “As a senator from a rural state, what I can tell Secretary Clinton [is] that all the shouting in the world is not going to do what I would hope all of us want.” A couple of minutes later, Sanders told former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley: “We can raise our voices, but I come from a rural state, and the views on gun control in rural states are different than in urban states, whether we like it or not.”

Can you explain what is so doubly bigoted about these two sentences?  Answer after the jump. (more…)

August 31, 2015

One of J. R. R. Tolkien’s earliest writings has been published this week in England.  (It will be released in the U.S.A. in April.)  It’s called The Story of Kullervo, a retelling of a dark episode from the Finnish national epic the Kalevala.  Hannah Sander of the BBC tells about the influence of this epic and of the Finnish language and mythology on Tolkien’s imagination.  In addition to direct parallels, Tolkien’s descriptions of Middle Earth owe much to the Finnish landscape and the Finnish language seems to have been a model for Elvish. (more…)

April 15, 2014

A sentence was stuck into the Farm Bill removing the 10 year statute of limitations on debts owed to the United States government.  So now the IRS is withholding tax refunds from the children of deceased parents who owed Uncle Sam money.

UPDATE:  The IRS has announced that it is stopping the practice.

(more…)

September 13, 2013

The Civil War established the principle that states are not allowed to secede from the Union.  But it also established the principle that counties can secede from a state.  West Virginia was formed when certain counties in Virginia refused to go along with the rest of the state in joining the Confederacy.

That has been the only time a state split up, though there have been other attempts to do so, which, if they had succeeded would have given us states named Shasta, Chesapeake, Absaroka, West Florida, Texlahoma, Montezuma, Rough and Ready, and Yazoo.

Today there are secession movements–usually rural conservatives wanting to break away from the dominance of urban liberals–in Maryland, Michigan, Colorado, and California.  (The Maryland breakaway would be called Augusta.  The one in California would be Jefferson.  Does anyone now what the others in California and Michigan would be called?) (more…)


Browse Our Archives