3 Reasons Trump’s the Ideal Evangelical Candidate

3 Reasons Trump’s the Ideal Evangelical Candidate July 28, 2015

It’s with horror and fascination that I watch Donald Trump jockey to be the Republican candidate for president. It would be an humorous diversion if there weren’t so many people who seem supportive of the idea. It’s almost as if Mike Judge’s classic film Idiocracy was some sort of prophecy.

On July 26, 2015, CNN posted the results of a political poll revealing quite a bit about the grass-roots support of the Donald Trump candidacy. There were no huge surprises, but in an article summing up the poll’s responses, this paragraph jumped out at me:

“The majority of those Republicans surveyed that wants Trump to remain in the race includes numbers of those seen as the core of the GOP primary electorate: 58% of white evangelicals, 58% of conservatives, and 57% of tea party supporters.”

58% percent of white evangelicals!? Seriously? At first I thought, “well, it’s obviously just a bad poll” but the more I thought about it, the more I realized that, in many ways, Donald Trump is American evangelicalism’s perfect doppelganger. Here are three things about Trump that might be resonating with evangelicals (because we recognize it in ourselves):

1. He thinks he’s an outsider (spoiler alert: he’s not)

Trump’s whole race is predicated on the idea that he’s a political outsider and the answer to everyone’s frustration with Washington. The problem is that he isn’t really an outsider. He might be newer to the political process, but he has the only thing that’s really important to the process — money!

The whole problem with Washington is money. Wealth and lobbying has had such a corrosive influence on the political climate, and that’s what Trump brings to the table in spades. He is constantly selling his billionaire status as a sign of his success and why he would make a great president, and then consistently demonstrating that his wealth and privilege isolates him from understanding issues like immigration and the problems experienced by common, middle-class Americans.

He’s just not the stranger to the political process that he’d like to imagine himself to be. His privilege has put him in the same circles and processes that most political pundits frequent. In fact, the way Trump’s donations have been courted by politicians, he’s more insider than he’d have us believe.

Like Trump, American evangelicalism likes to think of itself as an outsider. We’ve developed a mythos that makes us the put-upon and abused minority existing on the outskirts of American culture, but it’s just not true. The fact that we want to believe we’re outsiders leaves us just as out of touch as the Donald.

Christianity has spent over a century at the center of cultural authority in the U.S. When prayer was practiced in schools, it was Christian prayer. When we’ve had faith-based monuments in public spaces, they’ve primarily been Christian.  For decades, despite how evangelicalism views itself, it’s been one of the most courted demographics in American politics.

Evangelicalism was born into social influence in the same way that Trump was born into wealth. And every time there is a small shift toward equability for people who don’t share our values, it solidifies in our minds the idea that we’re outsiders. We try to establish our place at the head of the table by appealing to the Judeo-Christian values America was founded upon in the same way that Trump points to his success on NBC’s The Apprentice as a sign that he’d make a great commander-in-chief.

It’s no wonder that evangelicals love Trump; he’s spinning the same fable we are.

2. He exalts candor over wisdom

trumpOne thing I hear over and over from people is, “Trump tells it like it is. He’s not afraid to say what we’re all thinking.”

But then I look at some of his gaffes:

  • “[John McCain’s] not a war hero. He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren’t captured.”
  • “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending the best. They’re sending people that have lots of problems and they’re bringing those problems. They’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime. They’re rapists and some, I assume, are good people, but I speak to border guards and they’re telling us what we’re getting.”
  • “I don’t think Ivanka [his daughter] would do that, although she does have a very nice figure. I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.
  • I have a great relationship with the blacks. I’ve always had a great relationship with the blacks.”
  • “Rosie O’Donnell’s disgusting both inside and out. You take a look at her, she’s a slob.”

I think that if Trump is saying the kind of things you wish you could say, there’s a problem.

In a recent Twitter back and forth, Trump got into a war with Modern Family writer Danny Zuker. I can assure you that a sitcom writer would see an exchange like this as sport, and someone like Trump would be entirely outgunned (which he was). The problem here is that Zuker isn’t maneuvering to be the leader of the free world. I’m not sure that Trump is the guy I want negotiating with world leaders.

In a similar fashion, there’s a growing tendency lately among evangelicals online (and otherwise) to devolve into personal attacks. Learning to speak appropriately and disagree in a way that allows others to maintain their dignity should not only be a trait we expect from leadership, it should be a distinctly Christian trait. The fact that we increasingly think it’s okay to personally eviscerate people we’re at odds with says that we’re completely disconnected from the vine (John 15:5).

It’s a sad state of affairs when “telling it like it is” is so much more important than speaking wise, timely words.

3. He doesn’t know who he is

If you look at Trump’s record of political donations, over half of the $1.3 million he has donated has gone to the Democratic party. What’s even more surprising is that it’s usually been in local political races where he has vested real estate and casino interests. It’s curious that he would run as such a conservative candidate.

But weird inconsistencies are all part of the Trump mystique. He decries the outsourcing of jobs to China, while having his goods made there. He’s a proponent for “traditional marriage” who’s been married three times. He claims that McCain isn’t a war hero because he got caught, yet he was able to avoid military service all together.

It’s living with these kinds of inconsistencies that American Christianity has grown so comfortable with. We often see nothing weird about being strongly pro-life but against “socialist” programs that would ensure that not aborted babies of single mothers would have adequate food and housing. We consider ourselves travelers and sojourners in this world following a God who considers all the nations of the world to be simply dust on the scales (Is. 40:15), but we’re fiercely nationalistic and patriotic. We’ll dismiss anyone who doesn’t believe that the Bible is God’s word, but less than 20% of us read it on a daily basis.

When you consider the Janus-faced aspects of evangelicalism, it’s no wonder that we wouldn’t bat an eye that Trump seems entirely detached from his public relations persona.

Questioning our allegiances

Maybe it’s time to take a step back and ask ourselves what we see in this guy? He might not be the typical politician, but there’s definitely a potential Herod aspect to him — without any of the religious affiliation.

The fact that so many evangelicals are so enamored with him makes me incredulous. The outcry used to be that we need to elect a guy (and only a guy) that represented our theological interests, Trump doesn’t even have that going for him.

In the end, maybe evangelicalism is drawn toward Trump because looking at him is like looking in a mirror — and maybe that fact should give us a reason to pause and recalibrate.

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Beth Koch

    As an Australian, it’s been like watching a car wreck while my own car is being towed away behind me. We had a Donald Trump elected to parliament. His name is Clive Palmer. Also a multi billionaire, also a confused conservative, also a straight-shooter, also a supposed ‘outside voice’. I didn’t think it would happen here. It did, and his party holds the balance of power often. It’s frightening stuff, and I see history repeating itself in the US. One of the frustrating things for Australians and others outside the US is that a leader of the free world will be chosen in whom we have not had a say, but who will impact us greatly. Yet only half the US votes? Feel free to give us your left over votes if you don’t plan on using them!

  • If he actually becomes a candidate, I will come to Australia and clean your house.

  • Danny McDonogh

    You make me wish I was an American so that I could not bother to vote for Him.

  • Linda L Doyle

    WOW! You hit the nail on the head with this post!

    I have actually said some of those things about Trump and why he was surging in the polls but knew that, despite some seemingly positive traits, it was a scary proposition to even consider having this man as our next President.

    I just didn’t know how to articulate it so thank you for letting me know why it is not a good thing!!

  • J.M. Blaine

    Don’t forget the televangelist hair!
    Every time I see Trump I think about how much I’d love to see him on that dazzling white/gold TBN set playing hymns ala Liberace on that cream-colored baby grand beneath the giant stained glass cross.

  • Michael R Lindsay

    I just envision you extending your arm out to the side dropping the mic after writing this. I just hope that people can understand this post is not about Trump, but should serve as a warning to reevaluate what we truly believe in and how our actions reflect it. Well said Jayson, thank you.

  • John

    In reading Beth’s comments from Down Under, I was struck by one glaring omission – JESUS. Remember Him? You know, the One, Holy, True, Living, Eternal, Omnipotent God? The One Who possesses ALL power, control, influence, and authority, including over puny human authority figures? (I assume there are still people in the West who believe that.) Whatever happened to Him? Are Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Whitlam, Fraser, Gorton, Rudd, Gillard, and Abbott (and Trump) holding Him hostage? When in the Gospels did He ever say, “Between January 1, 1960 and my Second Coming, I don’t have a speck of power unless everyone in Washington, Canberra, Wellington, Ottawa, and London is an exact duplicate of me”? Just because we’re not living in Revelation 21-22 yet doesn’t mean we must act like it’ll never happen.

    I pray and weep for Beth’s beautiful country, which an early Spanish explorer called “The Great Southland of the Holy Spirit”. Nothing against Beth at all, but during the past half-century of my life, some of the angriest, bitterest, most hopeless, most pessimistic, most un-Biblical “Christian” attitudes I’ve ever encountered have been from Australians. You need a VERY powerful move of the Spirit of God.

    By the way – we have a nationally-syndicated daily radio talk show host here in the US (kind of an American Stan Zemenek) who preaches that Donald Trump is the one, only, sole, lone hope for America and its people, and that the US and its people are not fit to exist unless Trump is in the White House. This radio talker implies that God (Whom he doesn’t believe in half the time) endorses him, and tells his listeners, “If you don’t agree with me, DROP DEAD!”

    Who is greater, Jesus Christ of Nazareth, or some guy on the radio? Or some politician?

  • Beth

    Hi John, in no way do I omit Christ from my thinking about politics or the future of our world. I didn’t mention Christ in this one post because all I wanted to do was to make a comparison between Clive and Trump- the ‘it will never happen here’ or ‘surely not’ feeling Americans may or may not have, I too have felt, and then it did happen here. I probably shouldn’t have used the ‘car wreck’ analogy (I was just waking up when I wrote it!), because it doesn’t reflect how I feel about our two countries, or even our two political landscapes, but more that feeling of watching an electoral race play out in front of you and not being able to do a thing about it, and having just felt the impacts of a less-than-ideal election result myself. Does that mean that I have no hope? Or that I put my hope in politics to begin with? Absolutely not. Does an emotional reaction to the election of politicians who I disagree with make me a bitter person? No, I don’t think so. I’m sorry that you have met so many ‘bitter Australians’; that’s not been my experience. For what it’s worth, and as difficult as it may be to believe from our limited interaction, I am not one of them.

  • Beth,

    Thank you for offering such a kind response to this person.

  • John

    Beth and Jayson…I sincerely ask you to forgive me if anything I said hurt or angered you or your readers. For the love of Jesus. Thank you.

  • Really enjoyed this article 🙂 and your work in general. Glad I stumbled upon it!

  • Thanks so much, Elizabeth!