Apocalypse Not

Apocalypse Not June 17, 2012

Not all my vacation was spent visiting temples – I also did more reading than I’ve done in months. Long flights and evenings of rest following hours of hiking over ancient ruins present an opportunity to read that I don’t get enough of during “normal” times.

One of the books I put on my Kindle was AODA Archdruid John Michael Greer’s new Apocalypse Not, subtitled Everything You Know About 2012, Nostradamus and the Rapture Is Wrong. Although it covers the supposed end of the Mayan “long count” calendar, it’s not really about what will or won’t happen at this year’s Winter Solstice. Instead, it’s a rather detailed history of the apocalypse meme: how it originated, how it has manifest itself countless times over the past 3500 years, and why it persists despite the embarrassing and sometimes fatal results it has for those who accept it.

You won’t find an apocalypse in polytheistic religions, because polytheistic religions don’t need them. They may have eras and epochs which begin and end, but these are normal cycles of life. Apocalyptic thinking is a product of monotheism and is a direct response to theodicy – the Problem of Evil. If there is one God who is all-good and all-powerful, why does evil exist? Monotheists have invented several explanations (the Fall of Man, free will, etc.), none of which are completely satisfying.

The first occurrence of the apocalypse meme was in the first widespread monotheistic religion, Zoroastrianism, between 1500 and 1200 BCE. According to Greer,

Zarathustra studied as an apprentice priest. Around the time he turned twenty [he] experienced a shattering vision in which Ahura Mazda, “Lord Wisdom,” the only true god, appeared to him. Against the power of Ahura Mazda and his Holy Immortals were ranged Angra Mainyu, the Spirit of the Lie, and a host of demons who were mostly borrowed from the older Iranian gods.

That struggle … would come to an end sometime in the not too distant future with the final defeat of Angra Mainyu and the power of the Lie. All sorrow, suffering, illness, and death would end forever, the dead would come back to life, and faithful believers in Zarathustra’s teaching would enter into an eternity of bliss, while those who rejected the true faith would be forced to wade through torrents of molten metal and the like.

Evil, then, was only a temporary condition. Eventually Good would triumph over Evil, all would be made right and scores would be settled. It was a very attractive promise and it found its way into other cultures and other religions.

Jewish apocalyptic thinking began with the Book of Daniel. It is set in the Babylonian Captivity, but it is likely to have been written as propaganda during the revolt of the Maccabees against the Greeks. It borrowed from Zoroastrianism and predicted the rise of a Messiah who would set up a Jewish kingdom. The apocalypse meme drove rebellion against Rome, a rebellion which was brutally crushed in 70 CE. The result was the Diaspora – Jews scattered to the corners of the world. Would-be messiahs have arisen periodically in Judaism ever since.

The meme carried over into Christianity with the Book of Revelation: “the last and weirdest book of the Bible.” But when you get past the bizarre visions of Revelation, Greer says the message is clear: the author (traditionally presumed to be the Apostle John, but impossible to determine with any certainty) was predicting the fall of the very Roman empire which was persecuting the new Christian religion.

The astonishing detail is that he was right. The Roman Empire was, in fact, ravaged by epidemics and earthquakes in the three centuries between John’s vision and the fall of Rome. The terrifying horsemen showed up on schedule – historians call them the Huns. For a thousand years after the Christianization of the Roman Empire, Christianity was the unchallenged faith of the Western world.

John’s vision counts as one of the most spectacularly successful prophecies on record. Thus it’s all the more telling that only a small minority of Christians have ever accepted that they have already come true.

The prophecy is simply too enticing and too useful to give up. The Rapture – the return of Jesus – coming soon has been predicted since the beginning of Christianity. Early Christians expected not to die. Hilarian, a bishop in North Africa, wrote in 397 CE “Ponder how close these coming fearful events are!”

The villain of Revelation – the Antichrist – is a wonderful projection for your enemies. Various kings, emperors and popes have been labeled Antichrist since the Middle Ages. And if your enemy is the Antichrist, then the Rapture can’t be far behind. Greer details many of the predictions of the Rapture throughout history – and how every single one of them have been wrong.

A variation on the apocalypse theme are utopian fantasies, where some great change will happen and the world (or at least part of it) will live in peace and prosperity forever. The 1960s promised the Age of Aquarius, Karl Marx promised the withering away of the state, various UFO cults have promised either transformative knowledge or escape on a spaceship for true believers. Their track records aren’t pretty.

If the results of the apocalypse meme are so harmful to its followers, why does it persist? Because it while it ultimately fails – always – it offers an immediate payoff: hope. Your life sucks? It will all be better after Jesus returns. People abusing you? They’ll get what’s coming to them. All those other prophecies that were wrong? Don’t worry about them – we’ve got the direct line to God they didn’t have.

If you’re curious about how this meme started and grew, if you’ve got the slightest worry about 2012, or if, like me, Rapture prophecies once tormented you with fears of being “left behind,” I encourage you to read Apocalypse Not.

And then start working to build a better world right here right now. That’s the only way we’re ever going to get there.

"John, this reads to me like a pursuant scaled down and then dissipated."

Run Rabbit Run – An Augury ..."
"Gotcha. I misread your meaning. I thought you were saying that Christianity came to Ireland ..."

DNA Tests are a Curiosity, Not ..."
"Thank you, Mr. Beckett. And congratulations on the timing for this topic as well. I ..."

DNA Tests are a Curiosity, Not ..."
"I once did a period of devotion to a goddess about whom not much is ..."

Run Rabbit Run – An Augury ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • David

    I haven’t read John Michael Greer’s book yet, but, I’ve flicked through
    it in the shops and also listened to him talk about it in various
    podcasts, but, I think I have some disagreements, for one, historians
    who’ve actually studied the history of Zoroastrianism (and, with all
    respect to Greer, I don’t think he’s one of them) have said it’s hard to
    know much about Zarathrustra, so whether he was an “apprentice priest”
    or not is very very hard to know.

    Also, Pagan religions did have
    their Apocalypses, the Norse Ragnarok is the most famous (where the
    gods, and an army of warriors from Valhalla, will battle the forces of
    darkness, leaving very few beings alive, except for 2 beings who’ll
    repopulate a new world), and, while Hinduism isn’t Pagan, they have
    their own Apocalypses too (granted, they say, one Universe will end, and
    another begins, but, when it comes down to it, it still Apocalyptic, as
    it still predicts everything alive in this universe will be destroyed),
    and the ancient Greeks, I think it might have been part of the Stoic
    tradition, believed the Cosmos would end in fire, Buddhism, a
    Non-Theistic Faith (neither Monotheistic or Polytheistic), has it’s End
    of the World/Universe Myths, etc.

    The various Apocalypses are all different (even within Christianity), but, they are present in virtually all traditions.

    though I like Greer’s work, I’m not sure I’ll be buying it, to me, it
    reads more like a Pagan Apologetic (e.g. it’s kind of like saying “our
    Traditions don’t have this ridiculous Apocalypse stuff, so you
    Monotheists should come over to us, or be more like us”), and I’m not interested in that type of stuff.

    also disagree that Apocalyptic thinking stops people trying to change
    the world for the better, it depends on how you interpret the Apocalypse
    in question (for example to take Christianity as an example, there are
    some groups and individuals who wouldn’t want to change anything and
    just wait for Jesus to come down to save and destroy everything, but
    others interpret the Apocalypse in a more positive manner, and use it to
    fight for social change and Justice), in Judaism, one Apocalyptic
    scenario is known as Tikkun Olam, which sees fighting for Justice as a
    crucial step for all beings, to raise everything up to the Divine level,
    which, in effect, ends the Universe, in some way, etc. To take another
    example, if the book is right, and a cyclical view is more correct and
    enables people to fight for social justice, then, it surely didn’t
    inspire any ancient Pagan culture (ancient Greece and Rome were the
    biggest centers of injustice in the world – slavery, oppression of
    women, sending it armies to conquer and kill indigenous populations,
    etc, and no one tried to stop it, most thought slavery was “natural”).

    So, again, I think I’ll stick with Greer’s other works, as I don’t agree with the premise of this book at all.