A reader writes:

A news story caught my attention yesterday, a GOP candidate running for Alabama governor is basing his campaign solely on eliminating abortion from the state. I doubt the guy will get very far in the race, based on those who are running against him. But it brings up an interesting thought: If he does become the GOP candidate of choice, would a Catholic be required to vote for him – especially if his opposition is staunchly pro-abortion?

I’m not much into politics and share your feelings of politicians in general, but if his number one goal in office is to eliminate most or all abortions from the state of Alabama and the amendment or laws have the potential to be brought into the federal court system, in could create an interesting issue for Catholics and Pro-Lifers. (not a huge issue, mind you, as we Catholics are at a small 2% of the population here).

I’m not persuaded that we are *obligated* to vote for somebody merely because they are pro-life. I’m only persuaded that I am obligated *not* to vote for somebody when they are pro-death. A “pro-life” candidate might favor all sorts of other things repugnant to the Faith. We can’t turn opposition to abortion into an all-excusing shibboleth for incompetence, corruption, and other backroom deals with the culture of death. How many “pro-life” Catholics, for instance, are four square in enthusiastic favor of war crimes like the torture and murder of detainees? And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. A guy can be prolife and still be a deeply corrupt and incompetent ninny.