The Poisonous Fruit of Michael Voris’ Work

The Poisonous Fruit of Michael Voris’ Work June 19, 2012

Lifesite News issues a bulletin instructing the faithful to do what Voris acolytes always do: delude themselves that in attacking faithful Catholics they are bravely standing up to a shadowy liberal conspiracy when in fact they are living in a fantasy world. Readers in the combox immediately comply, slandering good Abp. Vigneron, just as, at the bidding of Voris, they previously slandered good Bp. Mulvey, SOLT, EWTN, the Register, CNA, and lots of other good and faithful Catholics who have dared to question or criticize… Michael Voris.

Ahem. Nothing in this pattern has changed since last year:

What’s going on then? Only this: Voris and his defenders in the comboxes are not really attacking Progressive Dissenters in this and several other contretemps. They are, by and large, attacking faithful Catholics in conservative Catholic media and labeling them as Progressive Dissenters.

Consider: …Would any normal healthy Catholic say that the Catholic News Agency is staffed by people devoted to “PC enforcement, demonizing of outspoken orthodoxy, and propagation of modernism”? Could any sane person talk as though the Register is dedicated to the protection of “libs and progressives and dishonest people who hate what he says about Catholic doctrine.” Only people who either cannot think or cannot grasp minimal standards of honesty and decency can say that is staffed by CINOs and socialists who “support abortion, gay marriage and a host of issues that are DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED TO CHURCH TEACHING.”

Seriously, people need to think about how absolutely ridiculous that looks to any normal healthy Catholic. So why do so many Voris fans fling such wild charges despite the fact that there is absolutely no evidence for them?

Answer: They write such things because Michael Voris urges them to think and say such things. For it is his perennial habit to declare that his mission is to trap and expose “lies and falsehoods” — not mistakes, differences in taste or approach, or well-intended but poorly executed prudential actions: lies and falsehoods. In short, he begins by characterizing those he criticizes as heretics, enemies of the Church and fifth columnists who must be “exposed.” Yet he often does so in such a way as to give himself a backdoor for denying that he is poisoning the well.

Exhibit A: Mr. Voris’ analysis of the Fr. Corapi scandal. Short story for those who missed it: Fr. Corapi was a popular priest who, as investigation showed, was behaving in ways which made him “unfit for the priesthood” as SOLT put it. His bishop (Mulvey of Corpus Christi) and superiors in SOLT took a whole lot of abuse from fans who refused to consider the possibility that Fr. Corapi could possibly be in the wrong. Eventually, Fr. Corapi abandoned his priesthood, was discovered to have been engaged in fornication and drug abuse (among other things), betrayed his vows, attacked his bishop as a libeler and a blackmailer and started the process of reinventing himself as the absurd superhero “The Black Sheepdog.”

How did Michael Voris respond? Referring to Corapi, he cast the whole thing in his standard Culture War template and suggestively told his followers who the real villains and hero in this drama were. Eulogizing Corapi, Mr. Voris declared, “He unabashedly talked about the angry homosexual subculture that controls so much of what goes on. He blasted unfaithful bishops … meaning not only the obvious ones but also the ones who quietly and cowardly sit back and let heterodoxy and heresy spread unchecked. It isn’t a stretch of the imagination to conclude many of the enemies he made and noses he got out of joint among the bishops and their lapdog media lackies are glad to see all of this going on.”

Does this sound familiar? It should. It’s the exact same scenario regurgitated in the combox entries cited above: Righteous Truthteller Persecuted by Corrupt and Sinister Liberal Cabal. Nor did the Corapians (as these sectarians now call themselves) fail to get the message. Mulvey and SOLT=evil. Corapi=Persecuted Saint. My comboxes (among others) swelled up and burst with denunciations of the persecution of Corapi by those horrid liberal bishops and their liberal media lapdog lackeys (meaning Mulvey, since he was the only one responsible for the investigation, and those in Catholic media who covered the actual facts as they emerged).

And emerge they did. It turns out Corapi was, in fact, unfit to be a priest and Mulvey and SOLT were absolutely right to call him to heel. Are there progressive dissenters who don’t much like Corapi? Sure. But was this, in fact, what brought Corapi down? No. It was Corapi’s own sins and rebellion against his bishop and superiors that did that. So why exactly did Michael Voris make the link with angry homosexuals and heterodox enemies if they had nothing whatsoever to do with the subject at hand? Because Fr. Corapi was a useful tool for doing what Voris always does: attacking the bishops as a shadowy cabal of liberals. It fit the template, so he ran with it and his audience, who believe every attack on a bishop Voris launches, ran with it too.

Only here’s the thing: Voris wound up siccing the angry mob not on “progressive dissenters” but on faithful Catholics who were concerned about the integrity of the Church’s witness — including Bishop Mulvey and the conservative and orthodox Catholic media who covered the story. In short, there was no cabal. There was only a brave orthodox and good bishop named Mulvey enduring tons of abuse from fans of both Corapi and Voris, but who stuck to his guns, thus exposing a fraud and a knave unfit to be a priest. Similarly, there were no liberal media lapdog lackeys. There was just conservative, orthodox, and faithful EWTN and the Register , which likewise caught an awful lot of flack from the energized followers of Corapi and Voris, who bought the complete myth that their entirely fair and just coverage of Corapi’s self-destruction was somehow part of a sinister liberal lapdog lackey conspiracy.

Bottom line: Mr. Voris’ picture, painted with the colors of hint and suggestion, that the story of Corapi was one of a Brave Truthteller vs. a Corrupt Shadowy Gay Cabal, was dangerously and recklessly false — and Mr. Voris has never noted nor retracted a word of it. Brave bishop Mulvey and the SOLT investigators (and the conservative Catholic press who covered the story) did the right thing with absolutely no thanks to Mr. Voris and the followers he egged on against a non-existent liberal cabal.

"Let me get the editor hat on!Many An insignificant handful of religiously motivated scientists are ..."

Since folks found Eons to be ..."
"I got sucked in. There is an angry crowd here and judgmental. I so want ..."

A reader puzzles over criticism of ..."
"I think that if you are suggesting Ben needs to 'bear witness to the joy ..."

A reader puzzles over criticism of ..."
"Have you heard the latest? Many scientists are convinced that the theory of evolution as ..."

Since folks found Eons to be ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • NDaniels

    John Shore
    Sort by Newest

    Post as NDaniels

    NDaniels • 3 days ago
    [More fundy tripe deleted]
    •Edit•Reply•Share ›

    NDaniels • 3 days ago
    [Insane fundy tripe deleted}
    •Edit•Reply•Share ›

    NDaniels NDaniels • a few seconds ago
    It is not insane to recognize that there is an order to Love, which is why a man does not Love his wife, in the same manner he loves his daughter, or a son, or his mother, or his father, or a friend; it is hypocritical to suggest because a mother Loves her daughter, and desires that she develop healthy relationships and friendships that are respectful of herself and others, in private, as well as in public, that some how a mother is not worthy of this same unconditional Love.
    •Edit•Reply•Share ›

    Oakley Flak Jacket Sunglass • 11 months ago
    That group has grown so fast that the

  • standtall909

    I listen to him often. He is a breath of fresh air really. He is one of the only people in the Catholic media that isn’t afraid to stand up to the ‘Church of Nice’ with all the ‘Church of Nice Bishops’ that are either spewing their falsehoods or allowing their Parishes to engage in public heresy with nary a word of reproach; not to speak of the ‘Catholic’ politicians who fight for gay marriage, abortion rights,and contraception while we pay for it all, and then not only allow them Communion but pat them on the back PUBLICLY as well. Talk about scandal……oh wait…..if anyone says anything, I guess that’s not charitable. Guess it’s more charitable for everyone to keep quiet about it and risk loosing tons of souls who may be led to perdition.

    • Peter

      Hmm, this comment reeks of Voris in a robust fashion… Michael, do you think we can’t see through you like glass? So decadently vain, scared, foolish, and ignorant/arrogant. Praying for you! 🙂

      • sixlittlerabbits

        I don’t think the commenter standtall909 is Voris. That’s wishful thinking on your part, Peter. Thanks, standtall909 for your comment.

  • JayHershberger

    As a recovering Protestant on a journey towards Rome, my impression of Mr. Voris is that he is just another angry fundamentalist (I have known too many in my life as a Protestant) who insists that everyone goose-step around the room to his tune. The difference here is that Mr. Voris has no authority to speak for the Church and its Magisterium. I do not have to listen to his interpretation of the faith–or any layman’s interpretation of the faith–in order to become a faithful Catholic. Given my background in Protestant fundamentalism, it appears to me that Mr. Voris and his followers behave like Protestants. He fulminates against any and all, his followers rally around him, and they invest him with the “biblical” authority to speak “Catholic” truth. It is irrelevant that he sometimes might get it right. I am thankful that I no longer have to allow this kind of fundamentalism to influence or have sway in my life as an aspiring Catholic…

    • Eduardo Patiño Neda

      You said perfectly dear Jay! Thank you and welcome to the Catholic Church.

  • reparatrix

    people would not have to turn to Voris if there were more outlets for our discontent. yes, we know he goes overboard sometimes (and we can filter his views), but we listen because there is no other…

  • A Student

    Voris did not say what you accuse him of saying. His message was that bloggers need not jump to conclusions regarding the guilt of Fr Corapi. He never attacked the bishop in charge of the case. He did suggest that there was a likelihood of prejudice against Corapi. You should watch the entire video in question without bias and provide all the relevant information, regardless of whether it would flow against your argument.

    I am sure Corapi received what he deserved, but let it be known that you are exaggerating facts and providing little proper citation. If you ever attended college, then you would know how to properly write. Establish credibility by proper citation or go back to school, but don’t plagiarize.

    P.S. Why in Hades do journalists think that they transcend the obligations of scholarship? This article is not a primary source.

  • William Conti

    I like Micheal Voris better then Mark Shea

  • Orthodox Polemicist

    I came across this while looking for an ancient anthema on usury of all things, Well, once again you write nothing of substance. Basically you bash the traddies again, who I am actually tired of. But your problem is you make a career of it, and further only make cheap, emotional attacks. I mean mostly you quote an article. What YOU say is that traddies are crazy conspiracy theorists, but really say nothing to prove it. I’d like to say something less polite, but you would just delete it. So I will say that a real man and good writer would provide substance to his argument. I will say that if a bear is the image of wisdom, you should go shave and then put on ashes for penance for your pride.

    • Orthodox Polemicist

      beard, not bear. My keys stick since I spilled something on it.

  • Winn88

    I listen to Voris’ videos but I’m not placing him nor anyone on a pedestal. What I once loved about what Fr. Corapi had to say was just that – what he SAID, not who he is or was. Voris talks like a man, not a smarmy womanish “I don’t want to offend anyone” “man” but instead a real man.

    Therein lies the crux – we all ought to love the Truth, God’s truth, His holy teaching from His holy Catholic Church. That is what we are all hungry for. I care not who teaches it but I love the teachings. I love God and His truth.