John Oliver, GK Chesterton, and Tired Democracy

John Oliver, GK Chesterton, and Tired Democracy April 8, 2015

John Oliver continues his fine work of educating the public in an informative-to-Joe-Sixpak (and Not Safe for Work) video that helps people understand what is at stake as the National Security state attempts to metastasize:

Some ask, “Can a free people willingly choose servitude?”

The prophet Chesterton replies that it is usually a free people who choose tyranny, something we see from the Roman Republic to Weimar. Against H.G. Wells’ notion that primitive man was a tyrant who ruled by force and fear and that democracy is a late development in our onward and upward march of Progress, he writes in The Everlasting Man:

It may be that in certain savage tribes the chief is called the Old Man and nobody is allowed to touch his spear or sit on his seat. It may be that in those cases he is surrounded with superstitious and traditional terrors; and it may be that in those cases, for all I know, he is despotic and tyrannical. But there is not a grain of evidence that primitive government was despotic and tyrannical. It may have been, of course, for it may have been anything or even nothing; it may not have existed at all. But the despotism in certain dingy and decayed tribes in the twentieth century does not prove that the first men were ruled despotically. It does not even suggest it; it does not even begin to hint at it. If there is one fact we really can prove, from the history that we really do know, it is that despotism can be a development, often a late development and very often indeed the end of societies that have been highly democratic. A despotism may almost be defined as a tired democracy. As fatigue falls on a community, the citizens are less inclined for that eternal vigilance which has truly been called the price of liberty; and they prefer to arm only one single sentinel to watch the city while they sleep. It is also true that they sometimes needed him for some sudden and militant act of reform; it is equally true that he often took advantage of being the strong man armed to be a tyrant like some of the Sultans of the East. But I cannot see why the Sultan should have appeared any earlier in history than many other human figures. On the contrary, the strong man armed obviously depends upon the superiority of his armour, and armament of that sort comes with more complex civilisation. One man may kill twenty with a machinegum; it is obviously less likely that he could do it with a piece of flint. As for the current cant about the strongest man ruling by force and fear, it is simply a nursery fairy-tale about a giant with a hundred hands. Twenty men could hold down the strongest strong man in any society, ancient or modern. Undoubtedly they might admire, in a romantic and poetical sense, the man who was really the strongest; but that is quite a different thing, and is as purely moral and even mystical as the admiration for the purest or the wisest. But the spirit that endures the mere cruelties and caprices of an established despot is the spirit of an ancient and settled and probably stiffened society, not the spirit of a new one. As his name implies, the Old Man is the ruler of an old humanity. It is far more probable that a primitive society was something like a pure democracy. To this day the comparatively simple agricultural communities are by far the purest democracies. Democracy is a thing which is always breaking down through the complexity of civilisation. Anyone who likes may state it by saying that democracy is the foe of civilisation. But he must remember that some of us really prefer democracy to civilisation, in the sense of preferring democracy to complexity. Anyhow, peasants tilling patches of their own land in a rough equality, and meeting to vote directly under a village tree, are the most truly self-governing of men.

A culture which has preservation of the right to crotch shots as its summum bonum is a culture that is absolutely begging to be enslaved.

"It's sarcasm. The charge was "king of the Jews". He had entered Jerusalem on an ..."

Some Reflections on the Crucifixion for ..."
"Thank you for this article. Can you explain why He is referred to as the ..."

Some Reflections on the Crucifixion for ..."
"It is great website, thanks for pointing it out."

Ignatius: A Brief Introduction to the ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Marthe Lépine

    No comment yet! And this has been on Mark’s blog since yesterday morning? I assume that many did not have the time yet to watch the video. For the love of your country, please do! The interview with Snowden is priceless, and very important, no matter what you think about the example used to demonstrate the “possible” use of those systems. Our Canadian government is presently trying to expand the surveillance organizations in our country – my nasty mind even suspects it might be at the urging of yours. If the populations do not wake up, we will all be in trouble (well, maybe not me, since I am almost 73 and I do not expect to be on this earth too many additional years, but think of your children and grandchildren, who may have to live in a frignteningly different society from what we have now, which is bad enough).

    • Pete the Greek

      Lots of people saw this before it was even on his blog (I saw it on facebook before this). I’m willing to bet that most of us don’t comment because, well, there’s really nothing to add to what was said. Add to that the fact that sighs directed at people who give away liberty in return for imagined security don’t translate well into comment boxes. Giving away their freedom in exchange for imagined security is what people do now, including most Catholics it seems.