menu

Immaculate Perception for the Immaculate Conception

Immaculate Perception for the Immaculate Conception December 9, 2020

Immaculate
Immaculate / Image by Goran Horvat from Pixabay

The Immaculate Conception showcases why it is better to be wrong for the right reason than right for the wrong reason.

Move the language, and you necessarily change the meaning. Theology changes as we change. You can see what I mean when you consider the theology behind the Solemnity yesterday, the Immaculate Conception.

Here’s a brief video explaining the connections:

Immaculate Conception Means??

What does the Immaculate Conception mean? I could parrot you the basics. But would that be of much help? Theoretically, you could train an African Gray to memorize the Creed, the Pater Noster, and the Ave Maria. If you did that, would the result be a faithful Catholic? I hope you think more of a believing Catholic than a parrot.

Pope Pius IX defined this dogma on December 8, 1854. His papal bull, entitled Ineffabilis Deus (“Ineffable God”), states that the Blessed Virgin Mary was free from sin from the first moment of her existence. Thus it reads,

“the Most Blessed Virgin Mary was, from the first moment of her conception, by the singular grace and privilege of almighty God and because of the merits of Christ Jesus the Savior of the human race, preserved immune from all stain of original sin, [that this] is revealed by God and, therefore, firmly and constantly to be believed by all the faithful.”

Pius IX consulted 603 bishops. Of them, 63 opposed this definition, including the archbishop of Paris.

From Where Do Dogmas Come?

dogma is a doctrine (Church teaching) promulgated in maximum solemnity and authority. Because it is a dogma, all Catholics are obligated to believe in the Immaculate Conception of Mary. Therefore, to deny dogma is to cut oneself off from the Church. Such post-baptismal denial of dogma is called heresy

Dogmas don’t pop out of thin air, though. All dogmas and doctrines of the Church are first beliefs, and all beliefs are outcomes of theology. All theology, in turn, is the outcome of faith. Doctrine develops, including those doctrines called dogmas. So it’s silly when some Catholics demand that teachers only “teach the faith!” as if faith can be given in a theologically-pure state. To teach the faith requires theology. There is no giving faith with some theology getting into the mix, including Scripture.

Evolution of the Immaculate Conception

Theologians laid out the groundwork for the Immaculate Conception long before Pius IX. Before it was dogma, it was a belief, although not a universally held belief. 

Like Bernard of Clairvaux (d. 1153) before him, and his Franciscan friend Bonaventure (d. 1274), Dominican Thomas Aquinas (d. 1274) refused to accept this belief. Brothers and sisters, in Catholic thought, St. Thomas is about as big a theological gun as you can have. He rejected the Immaculate Conception! It turns out he was wrong for the right reason—St. Thomas thought that believing in the Immaculate Conception necessarily detracted from the universal saving work of Christ.

By the way, the example of SAINT Thomas Aquinas, denying the Immaculate Conception of Mary, offers us an essential window into seeing a fundamental truth about faith, theology, and belief. On a relative scale, it is more important to be wrong for the right reason than to be right for the wrong reason.

In other words, you could have Catholics professing belief in Mary the Immaculate Conception for the wrong reason, and that wouldn’t be too good, would it? For instance, say I told you that I believe in her Immaculate Conception. Still, when you ask me to describe what it means, I respond by saying that it means Mary didn’t need a savior or salvation. Is that okay? 

Immaculate Conception and Cleaning Up Theology

This is one of many examples of why Karl Rahner said, “If you keep repeating dogma, it eventually becomes heresy.” Mary, the Immaculate Conception, most definitely required a savior. The Immaculate Conception, adequately understood, is the most outstanding application of Jesus’ saving act in history. It means that Mary is the most saved of all creatures.

This creative thought of Franciscan Duns Scotus (d. 1308) undergirded the definition of the Immaculate Conception by Pius IX. Thus, Scotus had overcome Thomas Aquinas’ objections. Consequently, it detracted nothing of Christ’s universal redemptive work (note what is of crucial importance!).

Connecting the Immaculate Conception

How should we understand and explain this dogma? To do that, we have to make some necessary theological connections. To grasp the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, I had better understand really well the underlying doctrine of Original Sin. Because if I get Original Sin wrong, or in an unhealthy yet verbally-orthodox way, I will necessarily distort the Immaculate Conception. For example, does the doctrine of Original Sin really mean to be conceived with gross underwear tread marks all over my soul? Or does it mean to be somehow created without any grace at all?  

No. But nevertheless, many Catholics imagine it does. And it follows that, to them, the dogma of Mary’s Immaculate Conception teaches that she alone among humankind was conceived in grace.

New Directions for the Immaculate Conception

But what if Original Sin meant something different? What if it instead referred to a universal condition of inauthenticity and brokenness that alienates humankind from God? Wouldn’t that change how we view the Immaculate Conception?

God extraordinarily exempts Mary from sin’s common impact (not physical suffering, death, and deterioration, which are natural), which is inauthenticity, alienation, and selfishness. And this was accomplished in anticipation of the redemptive work of Christ and her motherhood in that regard.

The Immaculate Conception says, therefore, that Mary is the most redeemed, the most saved. Grace isn’t a quantity—God is not a quantity—but in Mary and her irreducible yes, God is most intensely present among his creatures. This is for the critical role she would play out freely in the dance of God’s saving love.

Did she get sick, age, become feeble, and die? Why would you deny her these messy glories? Why would you deny Mary her humanity?

 


Browse Our Archives