Why Jesus Was a Horrible Preacher

Why Jesus Was a Horrible Preacher July 8, 2014

preacherOkay so the title was a bit of a tease, but at least you’re reading. Here’s my beef with seminaries today (I understand most of you reading this aren’t preachers, so we’ll chalk up this blog post to #PreacherProblems). The overwhelming way they are training new pastors to preach is verse-by-verse. (This approach preaches through an entire book of the Bible verse-by-verse, then picks another one and preaches through that. This style is in contrast with ‘topical,’ where preachers take a topic or theme and preach about it from Scripture). Verse-by-verse is the latest rage. I recently had a conversation with a seminary student on his preaching style. He said that he preached verse-by-verse, because that was the safest way to preach the totality of God’s word. Sounds great, doesn’t it? Noted theologian John MacArthur was subtle enough to write on the merits of verse-by-verse preaching and name his book “How to Preach Biblically.” Case settled, right?

My beef with verse-by-verse isn’t its form or function (I’m actually preaching verse-by-verse through Ephesians this summer, the first time I’ve preached verse-by-verse at Mt Vernon). My beef is the prevailing mindset coming from seminaries today that assumes that verse-by-verse is the only true way to preach, and all of us ‘topical’ guys are somehow mishandling the Word of God.

Here’s what I would say to that mindset: we never see Jesus preaching verse-by-verse. From our records in the gospels, Jesus was a straight ‘topical’ guy. You never see Jesus taking his disciples on a verse-by-verse exposition through the book of Leviticus. Rather, he’d pluck a verse or two from Old Testament scripture (Luke 4:18-19 is a good example) and expound on that. Even more frustrating for verse-by-verse folks, sometimes Jesus would teach simply by using stories (parables) with no Scripture involved. By today’s seminary standards, Jesus would have been a horrible preacher, reckless with Scripture and too cavalier in handling the holy texts. But as sacrilegious as it sounds, Jesus’ number one preaching goal wasn’t a verse-by-verse exposition of the Scriptures of the day. It was to teach people about and introduce people to his Heavenly Father. Jesus wasn’t a slave to verse-by-verse exposition, and neither should we be today.

QUESTION: Is there a ‘best’ way to preach? What’s your preferred style?

"Another ground rule should be that it is ok to be uncertain and accept some ..."

5 Ground Rules When Discussing Creation ..."
"Fox News can claim all it wants that it’s “fair and balanced,” just like CNN ..."

5 Ground Rules When Discussing Creation ..."
"Christians expect other Christians to be Christlike and tend to accept what is said as ..."

6 Reasons Christians Today are So ..."
"There are many views of both creation and evolution which sit quite well together and ..."

5 Ground Rules When Discussing Creation ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • An Unfolding Glory

    I never thought about it that way. I am just a regular lay person, and I definitely prefer verse-by-verse teaching (although I agree that topical sermons still have their place). I think that the difference between Jesus’ topical sermons and the modern push toward verse-by-verse lies in the difference in audience. His audience was largely Torah literate, even to the point of memorizing large sections of it. The modern American church has a tendency to be far less biblically literate, and therefore has many gaps in understanding–that’s where the benefit of verse-by-verse comes in. Thanks for the post! Blessings 🙂