What Three Dissents Signal for Marriage’s Future

Not only was the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Defense of Marriage Act baseless and just plain wrong, you won’t learn much from reading Justice Anthony Kennedy’s majority opinion. Except that he thinks only bigotry can explain support for marriage as it was until the year 2000—a male-female union.

You can learn something, however, from reading the three dissenting opinions closely. The conservative justices’ dissents are like flares signaling the path that marriage proponents must take from here.

http://www.redstate.com/ryantanderson/2013/07/02/what-three-dissents-signal-for-marriages-future/?utm_source=RTA+SCOTUS+RedState&utm_campaign=winstorg&utm_medium=email