I am a big fan of early Radiohead. “The Bends” (1995), while accessible to the pop music ear, offered enough innovation that every song was a wonderful adventure. With “OK Computer” (1997), the band hit its zenith by progressing pop music into explorations of soundscapes and unexpected turns of mood.
But then came “Kid A” in 2000, on which Thom Yorke began his eleven-year journey away from pop music and into explorations of abstractness with more emphasis on minimalism, textures, and rhythms with less emphasis on guitar and standard musical structure. The 2011 release “The King Of Limbs” continues the experiment.
I truly appreciate what Radiohead is attempting to do. My inclinations lean heavily into the progressive rock genre, from which Radiohead obviously was heavily influenced in their early career. Progressive Rock is not “Progressive” unless it is “progressing.” And Radiohead should be applauded for attempting to progress.
In a recent Readers Poll that NME did, Radiohead was voted the most influential artist in music today. You can hear their influences all over the place.
However, what I’ve experienced with Radiohead since 2000 is music that has been uneven and sometimes downright unlistenable. In spite of this, Radiohead continues to sell a lot of music – “Kid A” debuted at number one, and “The King of Limbs” is selling well.
But why? I think it has to do with one of the trappings of today’s pop music industry: Celebrity, marketing, and publicity. When “Kid A” was released, Radiohead was marketed as the cool band, the innovative band, the band that “you get, but the others out there are not sophisticated enough to get.”
“The King of Limbs” was nominated for five categories at the Grammy Awards: Best Alternative Music Album, Best Boxed or Special Limited Edition Package, Best Short Form Music Video (for “Lotus Flower”), Best Rock Performance (“Lotus Flower”) and Best Rock Song (“Lotus Flower”).
Really?
I know, if you’re a Radiohead fan, you are furious with me right now. But most people have dialed away from Radiohead in the past 15 years.
While Radiohead gets all that acclaim, there have been a number of other bands in the less-known Progressive Rock genre that have been innovative while maintaining musical structure and storytelling.
For instance, Porcupine Tree took what Radiohead had started and progressed that by adding heavier guitar riffs, changes in time signatures, mood changes, as well as soundscapes and textures that were exceptionally produced. Steven Wilson is every bit as talented as Thom Yorke.
Often times, the best of music provides emotional experiences because it is in a language that we understand, but then when it shifts and surprises us, we are taken off-guard and we learn new things, both experientially and cognitively.
This is basic pedagogy: Start with something recognizable and accessible, but then introduce new things into the mix, expanding the horizons of learning and experience.
This provides clues for us as we engage the world theologically.
We need to initially connect with people in a language that is accessible, with experiences and ideas and emotions that are commonly experienced, understood, and affecting.
But then we don’t stop there: We progress into areas not expected, building on common emotions and thoughts, but expanding horizons. Progressive Rock is known for its storytelling (both musically and lyrically), for its depth of musicianship (intricately written and played), and its ability to touch the heart as well as the head.
Porcupine Tree, “Arriving Somewhere, But Not Here” from the album, “Deadwing” (2005) performed live 2006.
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In