Fred Clark Highlights the Ridiculousness of Left Behind

Fred Clark Highlights the Ridiculousness of Left Behind March 11, 2012

Fred Clark has been blogging about the Left Behind books and movies, lately focusing on the second movie, Left Behind II: Tribulation Force. His comment about Rabbi Tsion Ben-Judah’s “research” which led him to faith in Jesus says it all:

“Ben-Judah reveals that his years of research mostly focused on the works of Josh McDowell.”

I saw the movie at some point, and found the same moment laughable. I understand that most Christians who read Matthew’s Gospel don’t look up the original context of his quotation from Hosea 11:1 in Matthew 2:15. But that a rabbi didn’t seems utterly implausible. But folks like Tim LaHaye and Josh McDowell don’t know any better, since they seem not to have looked up the original context either, and so aren’t aware that they have not done research, and thus don’t know how to depict characters doing research.

Here’s more from Fred Clark. Click through to read the whole thing.

Despite what Tim LaHaye says, John of Patmos was not writing a series of Nostradamus-like predictions to be decoded thousands of years later on a continent he’d never imagined. John’s Apocalypse was written for specific people in a specific place who were suffering through a horrible story under the heel of a triumphant Empire.

John’s contention, in spite of the way this story was going, was that the triumph of the Empire was not the real end of their story. Their story, he insisted, would ultimately have a happy ending. The Empire will fall, the horse and rider will be hurled into the sea, the first will be last and the last will be first and God will wipe away every tear.

I like John’s idea of a happy ending better than LaHaye’s.


"This seems a very strange comment, one offered as though completely unaware of things I’ve ..."

Elephantine, Leontopolis, and Gnosticism
"This article includes one remark warrants emphasis. "...there’s much more to be done if this ..."

Elephantine, Leontopolis, and Gnosticism
"This is genuinely fascinating, but as an inveterate nerd, I must ask -- where's the ..."

Guest Lecture and Academic Minute on ..."
"Yes, I agree. Technical arguments which supposedly prove (or disprove) the Resurrection are a waste ..."

Copycat Anti-Religion

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Gary

    I am not a literalist, but what can be more specific, Rev 1:1, “The relevation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants what must soon take place…”

  • Erp

    I believe the usual workaround is what is meant by ‘soon’.  Admittedly thinking God’s ‘soon’ is a lot longer than man’s ‘soon’ works better if you think the world is a few billion years old.   Otherwise ‘soon’ equals about  1/3 (or more) of all time.

  • Paul D.

    In short, God has difficulty figuring out what humans actually mean by certain words.

  • Jon Hendry

    I can’t believe Fred’s been at that since 2003. If it were up to me, he’d get a Macarthur Genius grant for it, just for staying with it for so long, with such quality.