Jesus’ Wife is Really Old

Jesus’ Wife is Really Old April 10, 2014

Via Jim Davila I learned that Harvard Magazine has an article which explains why announcing the results of the scientific dating of the fragment known as the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife took so long, and what the outcome is at the end of that process. Larry Hurtado also mentioned the breaking news, with links to the Harvard Divinity School website and from there to the relevant articles in the latest issue of Harvard Theological Review.

Apparently the second attempt at carbon dating suggests that the papyrus is from around 700 CE.

Does this mean that the text is not a “forgery”? No, but it deoends what one means. But it does indicate that the scientific data is compatible with the text being an ancient “forgery” rather than a modern one.

Be sure to read Jim Davila’s comments as well as the Harvard articles linked above. UPDATE: The blogosphere and news sources have been picking up the story left, right, and center. And so I am adding links as appropriate to further thoughts by Larry HurtadoBrice Jones, Daniel Burke on CNN’s Belief Blog, Tony Burke, John Byron, Jared Calaway, Chris Skinner, Katie GrimesJames Tabor, and G. W. Schwendner (twice, albeit both briefly). See also now the cautionary remarks of Christopher Rollston, and posts by Kushana Torumekia, Bob Cargill, Michael Heiser, and Peter Konieczny.


"(2/2) "in vain" seems to suggest it's a pretty bad state of affairs for the ..."

The Contradictory Dates for the Birth ..."
"1 Cor 15 seems to be a particularly rich text on the issue because Paul ..."

The Contradictory Dates for the Birth ..."
"The Book of Job is also very clear on the subject. Take a look at ..."

The Contradictory Dates for the Birth ..."

Browse Our Archives