#YCAS2015 Second Panel

#YCAS2015 Second Panel September 25, 2015

The first paper in the second session at the York Christian Apocrypha Symposium was by Brent Landau, focused on the Revelation of the Magi. In that text, Christ himself is the star that leads the magi, and he multiplies their food. When they and others eat that food, they experience visions of Christ. Landau suggests that this reflects practices and religious experiences of Christians in the time when Revelation of the Magi (RM) was composed. He suggests that a hallucinogen was probably ingested – and he notes the fact that some others have suggested the use of hallucinogens by reading between the lines in problematic ways, while this text is quite explicit. The narrative is very rich, and so how does one tell if real religious practices are in view? Landau cites Jim Davila’s work on the subject, and the criteria he delineates. Landau suggests that the details of the narrative may be fantastic, but the ritual elements – purification, prayer, and reading texts thought to stem from Seth the son of Adam – may correspond to what some Christians actually did. The magi have visions under the influence of the star, apart from food, but the food (always called “provisions”) which was exposed to the star’s influence enables others to have visions. RM fits at least two of the three criteria he has taken over from Davila. The third is less clear: RM does echo stories of multiplication of food in the Bible, and the ingesting of scrolls by prophets, but there is no explicit connection between eating and visions. IV Ezra and Joseph and Aseneth also hint that the consumption of certain substances may lead to visions, but it is not explicit as it is in RM. Indeed, this would be the only explicit reference to hallucinogensin ancient Jewish or Christian literature. This does not indicate that the work was written under the influence of such substances. How much can cross cultural study tell us about what they might have done? A Mazdean parallel may exist in haoma, but that was a drink. RM actually does not present the magi as Zoroastrian priests, but as descendants of Seth. Their name as magi is said to refer to their practice of silent prayer. And so if anything, RM downplays Zoroastrian connections. A commenter referred to Meredith Warren’s work on transformational eating (her book My Flesh Is Meat Indeed, and she also has an article on IV Ezra). D. C. A. Hillman’s The Chemical Muse was also mentioned. Anne Moore mentioned the Dura Europos baptistry, where the art reflects the ritual, including following the women and being greeted by Jesus, creating an experience. Do visionary accounts tie in to such evidence? Do they eliminate the need to posit ingestion of a hallucinogenic? Other psychotropic practices (sleep deprivation, wine consumption, etc.) are also relevant.

Pierluigi Piovanelli offered the second presentation in this session, looking at the Acts of Paul, Apocalypse of Paul, and the Zohar as examples of pseudepigraphy in which the works were said to be forgeries in antiquity. In Tertullian’s On Baptism there may be reference to a Cainite sect (the reading varies across the manuscript tradition). Jerome’s Lives of Illustrous Men adds that the forger of the Acts of Thecla was convicted of forgery before the apostle John. Piovanelli asked whether we can trust someone like Tertullian, who would have assumed that any work promoting women in ministry was a forgery. He also mentioned a new book, The Gospel according to Renan, which provides evidence of how opponents will invent accusations and these may be embraced by others uncritically, despite there not being adequate evidence for them. See also Abraham Zacuto’s account in Sefer Yuhasin of the confession of Moses de Leon’s wife about his forgery of the text, and the acceptance of this by anti-kabbalists and others. Piovanelli quoted Gershom Scholem’s Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism, which comments on pseudepigraphy and the need to distinguish it from forgery, the historian of religion not needing to join in the condemnations that theologians are prone to, or at least not in the same ways or for the same reasons. Bart Ehrman asked for clarification about whether ancient pseudepigraphers intended to deceive. Piovanelli replied by making reference to Jack Goody about actualization and rewriting. Reference was made to Philip Jenkins’ forthcoming book The Many Faces of Christ. Ehrman and Piovanelli articulated their disagreements about the categorization of the Book of Acts, and whether the “we passages” are a historiographical device attempting to evoke emotion, or represent an attempt to deceive readers.




""Everything is proceeding as I have forseen."- Palpatine"

How Star Wars Ends
""There’ll be no one to stop us this time.""

How Star Wars Ends
"Holy Cr*p !!!!!!!!!!!!!! He's Back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! My Lord Sidious is Back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! My blog willed him back ..."

How Star Wars Ends
"No, I don’t have a persecution complex. I am most likely an HSP (highly sensitive ..."

153 Fish – The Definitive Explanation

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • ncovington89

    Maybe this text doesn’t refer to drug use at all. If the bread is the Torah (as I think it is in the Synoptics, notice that they say there are *five* loaves) this may just mean that understanding the scriptures would lead to an understanding of Christ, or maybe to being granted a vision of Christ like the twelve.

    Whatcha think?

  • Gary

    Wormwood? Wine press of God? A lot of something being used in Revelation. Reminds me of college in the 60’s. That’s 1960’s, not 60’s AD.

    Rev 8:10And the third angel sounded, and there fell from heaven a great star, burning as a torch, and it fell upon the third part of the rivers, and upon the fountains of the waters; 11and the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter.

    Rev 10:9And I went unto the angel, saying unto him that he should give me the little book. And he saith unto me, Take it, and eat it up; and it shall make thy belly bitter, but in thy mouth it shall be sweet as honey. 10And I took the little book out of the angel’s hand, and ate it up; and it was in my mouth sweet as honey: and when I had eaten it, my belly was made bitter.

    Rev 14:19And the angel cast his sickle into the earth, and gathered the vintage of the earth, and cast it into the winepress, the great winepress, of the wrath of God. 20And the winepress was trodden without the city, and there came out blood from the winepress, even unto the bridles of the horses, as far as a thousand and six hundred furlongs.

    Rev 15:7And one of the four living creatures gave unto the seven angels seven golden bowls full of the wrath of God, who liveth for ever and ever. 8And the temple was filled with smoke from the glory of God, and from his power; and none was able to enter into the temple, till the seven plagues of the seven angels should be finished.

    Rev 16:16 And I heard a great voice out of the temple, saying to the seven angels, Go ye, and pour out the seven bowls of the wrath of God into the earth.

    Rev 16:19And the great city was divided into into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell: and Babylon the great was remembered in the sight of God, to give unto her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of his wrath.

    Rev 18: 3For by the wine of the wrath of her fornication all the nations are fallen;

    Rev 19: 15And out of his mouth proceedeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness of the wrath of God, the Almighty.

    • Gary

      As a connection to the OT, it seems a common theme to take a “drug” to express God’s judgement. Seems like much of Revelation’s bowls from the wine press of God’s wrath could be following Num 5:12-31, Law of Jealousy. And if you are using drugs to express God’s wrath in judgment, it seems a simple step to use drugs to predict the judgment in the first place through prophecy. So I think “this would be the only explicit reference to hallucinogensin ancient Jewish or Christian literature”…may not be so correct. Depends upon the definition of “hallucinogen”, I think.

  • On the topic of food and visions, in 1st Corinthians, Paul’s discussion of the Lord’s Supper (” This is my body which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.”) is followed immediately by his discussion of spiritual gifts.

    I wonder if there was an expectation in the early church that spiritual gifts naturally followed the partaking of the body of Christ.