More Textbook Disclaimers

More Textbook Disclaimers January 31, 2016

For those who live in an area where disclaimer labels are added to science textbooks, you might find a way to protest by asking that some of the additional stickers below be added to a variety of textbooks, including but not at all limited to those dealing with evolution.

textbook-disclaimers-789x1024

These come from Colin Purrington’s blog.

"I think that a historian using valid historical methodology might reasonably conclude based on the ..."

Mythicism and the Bacterial Flagellum
"I definitely think early Christian eschatology borrowed very heavily on Second Temple period eschatology, but ..."

Superseding Supersessionist Theology
"My main point is that the claim of yours that I quoted above isn't a ..."

Easter and Historical Nuance
"“we have multiple sources testifying to James being Jesus's brother, inside and outside of the ..."

Easter and Historical Nuance

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Are there any such areas?

  • The Mouse Avenger

    I have some comments to make regarding some of those disclaimers, if I may be so bold…

    1. I may be an evolutionary & Old Earth creationist, but I take offense at the implication that the stories in Genesis are a bunch of made-up phony-baloney. I not only believe in the reality of both Genesis & evolution & whatnot, but I also believe that the stories in Genesis do not have to be in conflict with science, & are entirely plausible on the whole.

    2. Furthermore, myths can be true or false. Also, I believe–no, I know!–that magic is just as real as anything else in this universe, & the supernatural / paranormal / otherworldly / magical / mystical / etc. are perfectly in line with reality as we know it in said universe, & are NOT limited to so-called “imaginary realms” (which may very well reside in alternate universes, but that’s another topic for another time).

    Now, I can get behind your basic sentiment at the heart of your article–don’t get me wrong!–but the author of those disclaimers really rubs me the wrong way. (S)he sounds like a major…well, meanie!

    • Wow, it was interesting reading some of these again after a few years had passed. Hopefully efforts to insert anti-science disclaimers into science textbooks will become a thing of the past, and then hopefully so too will parodies of them!